S'abonner

Efficacy of single versus double miniscrew-assisted maxillary anterior intrusion in subjects with gummy smile or deep bite: A systematic review and meta-analysis - 19/03/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ortho.2025.100996 
Dhruv Ahuja 1, , Siddarth Shetty 2, Rajaganesh Gautam 3, Puneet Batra 1, Toni Lego 1
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad, Haryana, 121004, India 
2 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India 
3 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Sant-Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri (Pune), Maharashtra, 411018, India 

Dhruv Ahuja, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad, Haryana, 121004, India.Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS)FaridabadHaryana121004India

Highlights

Bilateral mini-screws positioned between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines result in significantly greater maxillary anterior intrusion compared to a single mini-screw placed between the central incisors.
The bilateral mini-screws setup provides superior control over incisor inclination and stability during the intrusion process.
Bilateral mini-screws achieve effective intrusion with minimal side effects, offering a clinically favourable outcome.
The forest plot analysis supports the finding of significant maxillary anterior intrusion with the bilateral mini-screws configuration, further validating the approach.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Summary

Aim

The focus of this review is to compare the efficacy and predictability of single versus double miniscrew placement for maxillary anterior intrusion.

Material and methods

Systematic search for relevant articles published between 2005 and January 2025 was conducted across electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, WoS, EBSCOhost and Cochrane Library. Studies meeting pre-defined eligibility criteria were included and assessed for methodological quality. Data on intrusion of maxillary anteriors using MS was extracted from included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of single versus double MS in relation to anterior intrusion.

Results

The analysis showed that bilateral miniscrews (MS), placed between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines, resulted in significantly greater maxillary anterior intrusion compared to a single MS placed between the central incisors. Bilateral MS also provided better control over incisor inclination and stability with minimal side effects. The forest plot further confirmed significant intrusion with bilateral MS, with a mean difference of −0.25 and an overall effect (Z) of 1.98. The comparison between single and double MS demonstrated a significant effect of double MS on maxillary anterior intrusion (P<0.00001).

Conclusion

Bilateral MS configurations offer a reliable and effective treatment approach in maxillary anterior intrusion, particularly when considering individual variations in anatomical and clinical factors.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Miniscrews, Intrusion, Maxillary teeth, Gummy smile, Deep bite


Plan


 Clinical significance: this review addresses the gap in determining the optimal number of MS for maxillary anterior intrusion, revealing that double MS are more effective, offering valuable insights to guide clinical decision-making and enhance orthodontic outcomes.
☆☆ PROSPERO registration: CRD42025632352.


© 2025  CEO. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 23 - N° 3

Article 100996- septembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article suivant Article suivant
  • Performance assessment of artificial intelligence chatbots (ChatGPT-4 and Copilot) for sharing insights on 3D-printed orthodontic appliances: A cross-sectional study
  • Asma Muhammad Yousuf, Fizzah Ikram, Munnal Gulzar, Rashna Hoshang Sukhia, Mubassar Fida

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.