S'abonner

Pharmaco-invasive strategy and dosing of tenecteplase in STEMI patients 60 to <75 years: An inter-trial comparison of the STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 trials - 08/03/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.02.002 
Kevin R. Bainey, MD, MSc a, Robert C. Welsh, MD a, Yinggan Zheng, MA, MEd a, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza, MD b, Arsen D. Ristić, MD, PhD c, Oleg V. Averkov, MD, PhD d, Yves Lambert, MD e, Tracy Temple, BScN, RN a, Eric Ly, BHK a, Kris Bogaerts, PhD f, Peter Sinnaeve, MD, PhD g, Cynthia M. Westerhout, PhD a, Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD g, Paul W. Armstrong, MD a,
on behalf of the

STREAM-2 Investigators

a Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
b Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico 
c Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 
d City Clinical Hospital #15, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation 
e SAMU 78 and Mobile Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Versailles, France 
f Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), KU Leuven, Leuven and University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium 
g Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 

Reprint requests: Paul W. Armstrong, MD, 4-120 Katz Group Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1, Canada.4-120 Katz Group Centre for Pharmacy and Health ResearchUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaT6G 2E1Canada

Highlights

The STREAM-1 trial demonstrated similar outcomes with a PI strategy compared to primary PCI (PPCI) in STEMI patients presenting <3 hours of symptom onset and unable to undergo timely cardiac catheterization within 1 hour.
However, an excess of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in those ≥75 years receiving PI treatment was observed early in the trial prompting a dose reduction amendment of tenecteplase (TNK) to half-dose after which no further ICH occurred.
An analysis of STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 patients 60 to <75 years, found similar ST resolution and TIMI-3 patency with both half- and full-dose PI strategies with PI treatment (irrespective of TNK dose). These findings were also at least comparable than that achieved after their PPCI comparators.
Whereas the risk of ICH with half-dose PI treatment was 2.1% compared to 1.5% with full-dose PI therapy, there was substantially less major (non-ICH) bleeding. Clinical outcomes were similar to those with their respective within trial PPCI comparators.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

ABSTRACT

Background

Previous studies indicate a safety risk with full-dose TNK in elderly patients. In a study of patients ≥60 years STREAM-2 (STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial infarction-2), a pharmaco-invasive (PI) strategy with half-dose TNK was similar (in efficacy and safety) to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting <3 hours. While no treatment difference ± 75 years was observed, the role of this half-dose PI strategy in patients <75 years is unknown. In this comparison of STEAM-1 and -2, we analyzed PI strategies with full-dose (STREAM-1) versus half-dose TNK (STREAM-2) to evaluate their relative efficacy and safety in this younger STEMI cohort.

Methods

We evaluated patients 60 to <75 years from STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 receiving PI treatment versus PPCI for their resolution of ST-elevation after fibrinolysis and angiography, primary efficacy composite of 30-day all-cause death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and shock, and safety events.

Results

Among 1103 patients, 327 received a full-dose PI strategy (STREAM-1), 289 a half-dose PI strategy (STREAM-2) and 487 PPCI (338 in STREAM-1; 149 in STREAM-2). Half- compared to full-dose TNK resulted in similar proportions of patients achieving ST resolution ≥50% (71.2% vs 68.7%, P = .519): their ICH risks were 2.1% vs 1.5%, P = .605 respectively). Following angiography, PI patients had nominally better ST resolution ≥50% compared to their PPCI counterpart (STREAM-1: 87.7% vs. 83.2%, P = .120; STREAM-2: 88.2% vs. 81.0%, P = .048) with similar primary composite outcome at 30 days (STREAM-1: 14.4% vs. 16.3%, 0.90 [0.62, 1.31]; STREAM-2: 9.0% vs 8.1%, 1.29 [0.64, 2.61]). Major (non-ICH) bleeding markedly declined in STREAM-2 compared to STREAM-1 in both treatment groups (STREAM-1: 7.1% vs. 6.0%; STREAM-2: 0.3% vs. 0.7%).

Conclusions

In STEMI patients 60 to <75 years presenting within 3 hours of symptoms, half-dose PI treatment appears as efficacious as a full-dose PI strategy with a low systemic bleeding risk. Half-dose PI treatment deserves consideration when timely PPCI is not attainable in this important STEMI sub-group.

Clinicaltrials.gov registration numbers

NCT00623623, NCT02777580.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Graphical Abstract




Image, graphical abstract

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : STREAM, ICH, STEMI, PPCI, PI, RR, ECG, TIMI, CABG, TRIANA, ESC


Plan


© 2025  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 284

P. 20-31 - juin 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The left atrial appendage exclusion for prophylactic stroke reduction (LEAAPS) trial: Rationale and design
  • Richard P. Whitlock, Patrick M. McCarthy, Marc W. Gerdisch, Basel Ramlawi, John H. Alexander, Ibrahim Sultan, David Z. Rose, Jeffrey S. Healey, Yashasvi Awasthi Sharma, Emilie P. Belley-Côté, Stuart J. Connolly
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Impact of a clinical atrial fibrillation risk estimation tool on cardiac rhythm monitor utilization following acute ischemic stroke: A prepost clinical trial
  • Jeffrey M. Ashburner, Reinier W.P. Tack, Shaan Khurshid, Ashby C. Turner, Steven J. Atlas, Daniel E. Singer, Patrick T. Ellinor, Emelia J. Benjamin, Ludovic Trinquart, Steven A. Lubitz, Christopher D. Anderson

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.