S'abonner

Risk of invasive meningococcal disease in people with sickle cell disease: A systematic review - 05/03/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106441 
Catherine Isitt a, c, Helen Campbell b, Catherine A. Cosgrove a, d, Mary E. Ramsay b, Paul T. Heath a, Ray Borrow e, Shamez N. Ladhani a, b,
a Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infections (CNPI), City St George’s University of London, London, UK 
b Immunisation Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK 
c Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 
d Department of Infectious Disease, St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
e Vaccine Evaluation Unit, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Manchester, UK 

Correspondence to: Immunisation Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), 62 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK.Immunisation Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)62 Colindale AvenueLondonNW9 5EQUK

Summary

Background

Asplenia and splenic dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of severe and fatal infections, especially due to encapsulated bacteria including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae serotype b (Hib) and Neisseria meningitidis. People with sickle cell disease (SCD) develop recurrent splenic infarcts rendering them functionally asplenic. Consequently, additional vaccination against these three pathogens is recommended. There is robust evidence of an increased risk for invasive pneumococcal (IPD) and Hib disease, in people with SCD, but for not invasive meningococcal disease (IMD).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) recommendations. Studies published in any language before June 2024 and including people with SCD of all ages and from all geographical locations were included. Studies were included if they documented bacterial culture and/or PCR in patients with SCD with suspected infection. The primary outcome was to estimate IMD risk in people with SCD. Secondary outcomes included estimating the risk of IMD and Hib disease in people with SCD.

Findings

We identified 3804 publications and included 86 in the final analyses. Among 74 cohort studies published during 1971–2023, there were three IMD cases among 26,404 persons with SCD compared with 570 IPD and 113 Hib cases. Eight case-control studies published during 1983–2022 reported one IMD case among 932 people with SCD (0.1%) compared to 118 IMD cases among 7143 people without SCD (1.65%). In contrast, there were 126 IPD cases (126/932, 13.5%) in people with SCD compared to 588 (588/7143, 8.2%) in those without SCD. For Hib, the rates were 32/932 (3.4%) and 316/7143 (4.4%), respectively. After including all published studies, we identified five IMD cases in people with SCD across studies published worldwide during 1965–1995 and all five survived their infection.

Interpretation

We found no evidence of any increased risk of IMD in people with SCD. This has important implications for policymakers in countries and organisations that currently recommend meningococcal vaccination for people with SCD.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Sickle cell anaemia, Invasive meningococcal disease, Meningococcal vaccines


Plan


Crown Copyright © 2025  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 90 - N° 3

Article 106441- mars 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • An MDR Salmonella Enteritidis sublineage associated with gastroenteritis outbreaks and invasive disease in China
  • Xiaoyi Zheng, Ying Xiang, Xiaoying Li, Xinying Du, Yule Wang, Sai Tian, Jingzhuang Xue, Ying Huang, HONGBO LIU, Qi Wang, Hongbo Liu, Hui Wang, Chao Wang, Mingjuan Yang, Huiqun Jia, Ligui Wang, Xuebin Xu, Lihua Song, Hongbin Song, Shaofu Qiu
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Increasing child vaccination coverage can reduce influenza cases across age groups: An agent-based modeling study
  • Katherine V. Williams, Mary G. Krauland, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Lee H. Harrison, John V. Williams, Mark S. Roberts, Richard K. Zimmerman

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.