S'abonner

Association With Outcomes of Correcting the Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method to Quantitate Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation - 03/03/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.echo.2024.10.015 
Michele Tomaselli, MD a, Marco Penso, BME a, Luigi P. Badano, MD, PhD a, b, , Alexandra Clement, MD c, Noela Radu, MD a, Francesca Heilbron, MD a, Mara Gavazzoni, MD a, Diana R. Hădăreanu, MD, PhD d, Giorgio Oliverio, MD a, Samantha Fisicaro, RDCS a, Paolo Springhetti, MD e, Cinzia Pece, MD a, b, Caterina Delcea, MD, PhD f, Denisa Muraru, MD, PhD a, b
a Department of Cardiology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy 
b Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy 
c Internal Medicine Department, “Grigore T. Popa”, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania 
d Department of Cardiology, Clinical Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, Craiova, Romania 
e Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy 
f Cardiology Department, Carol Davila, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania 

Reprint requests: Luigi P. Badano, MD, PhD, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Department of Cardiology, IRCCS, P. le Brescia 20, Milan 20149, Italy.Istituto Auxologico ItalianoDepartment of CardiologyIRCCSP. le Brescia 20Milan20149Italy

Abstract

Background

Although the correction of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been shown to improve the accuracy of assessing the severity of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR), its clinical impact remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the association of the quantitative parameters of STR severity obtained from the corrected and conventional PISA methods with outcomes.

Methods

Both conventional and corrected effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) (EROA vs corrected EROA [EROAc]), regurgitant volume (RegVol) (RegVol vs corrected RegVol [RegVolc]), and regurgitant fraction (RegFr) (RegFr vs corrected RegFr [RegFrc]) were measured in 519 consecutive patients (mean age, 75 ± 12 years; 44% men; 74% with ventricular STR) with moderate and severe STR. The end point was a composite of heart failure hospitalization and death.

Results

EROAc, RegVolc, and RegFrc were significantly larger than EROA, RegVol, and RegFr (P < .001 for all). After a mean follow-up period of 19 ± 15 months, 210 patients reached the end point. Using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, the parameters obtained from the corrected PISA method were more closely associated with outcomes at 2 years than those obtained with the conventional PISA method: EROAc vs EROA (P < .001), RegVolc vs RegVol (P = .001), and RegFrc vs RegFr (P < .001) for ventricular STR. Conversely, no significant differences were detected for atrial STR. After multivariable adjustment, both uncorrected and corrected EROA, RegVol, and RegFr were independently associated with the end point. Using the new five-grade severity scheme, patients reclassified using the corrected PISA method had a significantly higher rate of events compared with those not reclassified among those with ventricular STR (P = .0086). Conversely, this relationship was not statistically significant in patients with atrial STR (P = .061).

Conclusions

Correcting the PISA method provides larger quantitative parameters of STR severity that are more closely associated with outcomes in patients with ventricular STR.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Central Illustration

Association with outcomes of correcting the PISA method in STR. SV, Stroke volume; Va, aliasing velocity; Vp, peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity; VTI, velocity-time integral.



Central Illustration : 

Association with outcomes of correcting the PISA method in STR. SV, Stroke volume; Va, aliasing velocity; Vp, peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity; VTI, velocity-time integral.


Central IllustrationAssociation with outcomes of correcting the PISA method in STR. SV, Stroke volume; Va, aliasing velocity; Vp, peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity; VTI, velocity-time integral.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

The conventional PISA method underestimates the severity of STR.
In V-STR, applying the corrected PISA method refines risk stratification.
Reclassifying TR severity identifies patients at higher risk.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Secondary tricuspid regurgitation, Tricuspid regurgitation severity, Echocardiography, PISA method, Effective regurgitant orifice area, Regurgitant volume, Regurgitant fraction, Outcome

Abbreviations : A-STR, AUC, EROA, EROAc, HF, HR, LOA, LV, LVEF, MR, NYHA, PISA, RA, RegFr, RegFrc, RegVol, RegVolc, RV, RVEF, STR, TR, TV, Va, VC, VCmax, VCmin, Vp, V-STR


Plan


 This research was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health – Ricerca Finalizzata (grant RF-202112374122).
 Drs Tomaselli and Penso contributed equally to this work.
 Jordan B. Strom, MD, MSc, served as guest editor for this report.


© 2024  American Society of Echocardiography. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 38 - N° 3

P. 195-207 - mars 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Impact of Length Indexing of Deformation in Echocardiographic Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function
  • Weiting Huang, James Hodovan, Avneesh Sharma, Matteo Morello, Onur Varli, Bethany Gholson, Jonathan R. Lindner
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The Forgotten Truth About Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Correction in Tricuspid Regurgitation
  • Ratnasari Padang, Jeremy J. Thaden

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.