S'abonner

Optimising titanium implant stability and infection resistance through iron nanoparticle coatings: A preclinical investigation - 20/12/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102155 
Santosh Nelogi a, , Anand kumarpatil b, Ramesh Chowdhary c, Richa Roy d
a KLEVK Institute of Dental Science, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgavi, Karnataka, India 
b Department of Prosthodontics, KLEVK Institute of Dental Science, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgavi, Karnataka, India 
c Department of Prosthodontics, Siddhartha Institute of Dental Science, Karnataka, India 
d Cochin Implant Centre Kalamassery, Cochin, India 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

Attaining adequate osseointegration and mitigating infections are paramount issues in implantology, especially within dental and orthopaedic domains. Titanium implants have been utilised for their biocompatibility and mechanical strength; yet, problems such as peri‑implant infections and inadequate bone integration may undermine their efficacy. Coating titanium implants with iron nanoparticles (FeNp) has surfaced as a promising approach to improve osseointegration and antibacterial characteristics. FeNp's distinctive capacity to react to magnetic fields and produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) has the potential to enhance implant results.

Objective

To assess the influence of FeNp-coated titanium implants on osseointegration, mechanical stability, osteogenesis, and antibacterial effectiveness against prevalent implant-associated infections, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.

Materials and methods

In vivo investigations were performed on animal models to evaluate implant stability by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and removal torque measurements at 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation. Histopathological assessment was conducted to analyze the osseous formation and vascularization surrounding the implants. Furthermore, in vitro experiments were employed to assess the antibacterial efficacy of magnetized FeNp against S. aureus and E. coli.

Results

At 6 weeks, no substantial change was detected in (RFA) or removal torque between the control group (GROUP A) and the test group (GROUP B). However, by 12 weeks, GROUP B demonstrated significantly higher RFA scores (75.02 ± 5.11) compared to GROUP A (67.41 ± 9.85), indicating improved implant stability (p < 0.05). Removal torque values were also significantly higher in GROUP B at 12 weeks (76.30 ± 14.20) compared to GROUP A (46.10 ± 9.25), suggesting enhanced mechanical integration (p < 0.01). Histopathological analysis revealed greater new bone formation, increased osteoblast activity, and improved vascularization around FeNp-coated implants in GROUP B. Additionally, in vitro antibacterial testing demonstrated that FeNp coatings effectively inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli, providing further evidence of its antimicrobial effect

Conclusion

FeNp-coated implants have dual advantages: improved osseointegration and antibacterial defence. The findings indicate that FeNp coatings might substantially enhance implant longevity and diminish the likelihood of infection, offering a potential approach for clinical applications, especially for patients at elevated risk of implant failure. Subsequent research should concentrate on enhancing the application of FeNp coatings in clinical environments and further examining their long-term biocompatibility and effectiveness.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Iron nanoparticles, Titanium implants, Osseointegration, Antibacterial characteristics, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Implant stability

Abbreviations : FeNps, Ti, S aureus, Ecoli, MIC, RFA, SD


Plan


© 2024  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 126 - N° 6

Article 102155- décembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Does the type of cleft have an impact on language results? Validation of the Nasalance test in French
  • Astrid Richard, Serena Brontoladi, Estelle Sanquer, Cécile Chapuis-Vandenbogaerde, Alexandra Bucur, Valérie Charpillet, Véronique Soupre, Arnaud Picard, Natacha Kadlub
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Evaluation of dimensional changes of the nasolacrimal canal after rapid maxillary expansion: A cone-beam computed tomography study
  • Ozge Muftuoglu Guler, Elif Meltem Aslan Ozturk

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.