S'abonner

Duration of antimicrobial treatment for uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia: Another example of shorter is better - 06/12/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106313 
Nicolas Fourré a, Virgile Zimmermann a, Laurence Senn a, b, Marion Aruanno c, Benoit Guery a, Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris a, b, d, , 1
a Infectious Diseases Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland 
b Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland 
c Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland 
d Infectious Diseases Service, Cantonal Hospital of Sion and Institut Central des Hôpitaux, Sion, Switzerland 

Correspondence to: Infectious Diseases Service, Cantonal Hospital of Sion and Institut Central des Hôpitaux, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.Infectious Diseases Service, Cantonal Hospital of Sion and Institut Central des HôpitauxSion1951Switzerland

Summary

Objectives

Duration of treatment for uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia is unknown. The study aims to assess clinical outcomes of patients with uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia receiving a short course (5–10 days) of antimicrobial treatment compared to those receiving the traditional, longer duration (11–18 days).

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland and included episodes of uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia among adult patients from 2015 to 2023. Clinical failure was defined as mortality, recurrence of bacteraemia by the same streptococcal species and development in bone and joint infection within 120 days.

Results

During the study period, 336 episodes of uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia were included. The median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 10 days (interquartile range: 7–14); 184 (55%) and 152 (45%) episodes received a short (5–10 days) and long (11–18 days) duration of antimicrobial treatment, respectively. Forty-three (13%) episodes had clinical failure; 120-day mortality was 11% (36 episodes); recurrence of bacteraemia by the same streptococcal species was observed in 8 episodes (2%). No difference in clinical failure was observed between episodes receiving short and long courses of antimicrobial treatment (10% versus 16%; P 0.143). The Cox multivariable regression model found that a Charlson comorbidity index >4 (aHR 4.87, 95% CI 3.08–7.71), and septic shock (1.67, 1.04–2.67) were associated with clinical failure; a short course of antimicrobial treatment was not associated with clinical failure (0.90, 0.57–1.12).

Conclusions

This study has shown that a short duration of antimicrobial treatment for cases of streptococcal bacteraemia is effective and safe.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

336 episodes of uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia were included.
184 and 152 episodes received a short (5-10 days) and long (11-18 days) course.
Primary endpoint: 120 days mortality, or bacteraemia recurrence.
It was met by 43 (13%) episodes; 10% in short vs 16% in long course (P 0.143).
Charlson comorbidity index >4 and septic shock were associated with primary endpoint.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Streptococci, Uncomplicated bacteraemia, Sepsis, Shorter is better, Duration of antimicrobial treatment


Plan


© 2024  The Author(s). Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 89 - N° 6

Article 106313- décembre 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine in South African people living with and without HIV-1 infection: A phase 2 randomised trial
  • Chijioke Bennett, Zaheer Hoosain, Anthonet Koen, Umesh Lalloo, Cheryl Louw, Vongane Maluleke, Faeezah Patel, Gabriella Benade, Esme Louise Venter, Shirley Galbiati, Vivek Shinde, Shabir A. Madhi, on behalf of the Study 2019nCoV-505 Investigators Group
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Infant-derived human nasal organoids exhibit relatively increased susceptibility, epithelial responses, and cytotoxicity during RSV infection
  • Gina M. Aloisio, Divya Nagaraj, Ashley M. Murray, Emily M. Schultz, Trevor McBride, Letisha Aideyan, Erin G. Nicholson, David Henke, Laura Ferlic-Stark, Anubama Rajan, Amal Kambal, Hannah L. Johnson, Elina Mosa, Fabio Stossi, Sarah E. Blutt, Pedro A. Piedra, Vasanthi Avadhanula

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.