Item-Level Investigation of Participant and Study Partner Report on the Cognitive Function Index from the A4 Study Screening Data - 21/11/24

Doi : 10.14283/jpad.2021.8 
R.E. Amariglio 1, 2, , S.A.M. Sikkes 6, G.A. Marshall 1, 2, R.F. Buckley 2, 7, 8, J.R. Gatchel 3, 4, K.A. Johnson 1, 5, D.M. Rentz 1, 2, M.C. Donohue 9, R. Raman 9, C.-K. Sun 9, R. Yaari 10, K.C. Holdridge 10, J.R. Sims 10, J.D. Grill 11, P.S. Aisen 9, R.A. Sperling 1, 2

A4 Study Team

1 Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 02115, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
2 Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
3 Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
4 Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA 
5 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
6 Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands 
7 Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
8 Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
9 Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA 
10 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA 
11 University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA 

a ramariglio@partners.org ramariglio@partners.org

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Background

Greater subjective cognitive changes on the Cognitive Function Index (CFI) was previously found to be associated with elevated amyloid (Aβ) status in participants screening for the A4 Study, reported by study partners and the participants themselves. While the total score on the CFI related to amyloid for both sources respectively, potential differences in the specific types of cognitive changes reported by either participants or their study partners was not investigated.

Objectives

To determine the specific types of subjective cognitive changes endorsed by participants and their study partners that are associated with amyloid status in individuals screening for an AD prevention trial.

Design, Setting, Participants

Four thousand four hundred and eighty-six cognitively unimpaired (CDR=0; MMSE 25–30) participants (ages 65–85) screening for the A4 Study completed florbetapir (Aβ) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. Participants were classified as elevated amyloid (Aβ+; n=1323) or non-elevated amyloid (Aβ-; n=3163).

Measurements

Prior to amyloid PET imaging, subjective report of changes in cognitive functioning were measured using the CFI (15 item questionnaire; Yes/Maybe/No response options) and administered separately to both participants and their study partners (i.e., a family member or friend in regular contact with the participant). The impact of demographic factors on CFI report was investigated. For each item of the CFI, the relationship between Aβ and CFI response was investigated using an ordinal mixed effects model for participant and study partner report.

Results

Independent of Aβ status, participants were more likely to report ‘Yes’ or ‘Maybe’ compared to the study partners for nearly all CFI items. Older age (r= 0.06, p<0.001) and lower education (r=-0.08, p<0.001) of the participant were associated with higher CFI. Highest coincident odds ratios related to Aβ+ for both respondents included items assessing whether ‘a substantial decline in memory’ had occurred in the last year (ORsp= 1.35 [95% CI 1.11, 1.63]; ORp= 1.55 [95% CI 1.34, 1.79]) and whether the participant had ‘seen a doctor about memory’ (ORsp= 1.56 [95% CI 1.25, 1.95]; ORp =1.71 [95% CI 1.37, 2.12]). For two items, associations were significant for only study partner report; whether the participant ‘Repeats questions’ (ORsp = 1.30 [95% CI 1.07, 1.57]) and has ‘trouble following the news’ (ORsp= 1.46[95% CI 1.12, 1.91]). One question was significant only for participant report; ‘trouble driving’ (ORp= 1.25 [95% CI 1.04, 1.49]).

Conclusions

Elevated Aβ is associated with greater reporting of subjective cognitive changes as measured by the CFI in this cognitively unimpaired population. While participants were more likely than study partners to endorse change on most CFI items, unique CFI items were associated with elevated Aβ for participants and their study partners, supporting the value of both sources of information in clinical trials.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Subjective cognitive cecline, amyloid, clinical trial, Alzheimer’s disease


Plan


© 2021  THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of SERDI Publisher.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 8 - N° 3

P. 257-262 - mars 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Effects of Folic Acid and Vitamin B12 Supplementation on Cognitive Impairment and Inflammation in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
  • H. Chen, S. Liu, B. Ge, D. Zhou, M. Li, W. Li, F. Ma, Z. Liu, Yong Ji, Guowei Huang
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Environmental Distractions during Unsupervised Remote Digital Cognitive Assessment
  • E.N. Madero, J. Anderson, N.T. Bott, A. Hall, D. Newton, N. Fuseya, J.E. Harrison, Jennifer Rae Myers, J.M. Glenn

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.