Food insecurity and ultra-processed food consumption in the Health and Retirement Study: Cross-sectional analysis - 15/11/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100422

Abeer A. Aljahdali ^a,^b,⁎
^a Department of Clinical Nutrition, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
^b Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States

^⁎Corresponding author at: Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Nutrition, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box: 80200, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Faculty of Applied Medical SciencesDepartment of Clinical NutritionKing Abdulaziz UniversityP.O. Box: 80200Jeddah21589Saudi Arabia

connectez-vous ou créez un compte

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Sous presse. Manuscrit accepté. Disponible en ligne depuis le Friday 15 November 2024
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder

Abstract

Background

Higher ultra-processed foods (UPF), attributed to more than half of daily intake in the US, have been associated with impaired health outcomes. Documented evidence highlights disparities in UPF consumption due to food insecurity, which is a public health challenge among older adults in the US.

Objectives

The study examined the link between food insecurity and UPF consumption. The potential of participants’ sex, age, and race and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation in modifying the association were explored.

Method

The analytical sample comprised 6,295 US adults, aged 52 – 101 years, enrolled in the longitudinal Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative study of aging. Food insecurity was evaluated in the 2013 HRS Health Care and Nutrition Study using the six-item Short Form Food Security Survey Module. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire, and UPFs, quantified using the NOVA food classification system, were expressed as a percentage of total energy intake. The association between food insecurity and UPFs was examined using linear regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics.

Results

The prevalence of food insecurity was 15%. Mean UPFs% (95% confidence intervals) were 49.1 (47.8, 50.3), 48.5 (46.6, 50.4), and 52.3 (50.4, 54.3) among adults with food security, low food security, and very low food security, respectively (P-trend = 0.0156). Race modifies the association between food insecurity and UPFs (P-interaction = 0.0033). A positive linear trend was detected among Whites (P-trend = 0.0036), but an inverse linear trend was found among African Americans (P-trend = 0.0007). There was no evidence for heterogeneity by age, sex, or SNAP participation.

Conclusion

Food insecurity was positively correlated with UPF consumption among adults in the US. Race modifies the association with a positive linear trend among Whites and an inverse linear trend among African Americans. Further efforts are needed to promote healthy aging via improving diet quality among food-insecure older adults.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : UPFs, SNAP, HRS, HCNS, FFQ

Keywords : Food insecurity, older adults, food processing, ultra-processed food, Health and Retirement Study (HRS), US, SNAP