Disparities in clinical drug trial participation in endometrial cancer: a real-world analysis - 05/11/24
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
Abstract |
Background |
Racial disparities in clinical trial participation for uterine cancer have been reported.
Objective |
We sought to examine disparities of endometrial cancer patient participation in clinical drug trials in a contemporary, real-world population in the United States.
Study Design |
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced or recurrent patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed from 2013 to 2021 using a real-world electronic health record-derived database representing approximately 800 academic and community practice sites across the United States. We used multilevel Poisson regression modeling to analyze the association of clinical drug trial participation with patient, sociodemographic, health system, and cancer factors.
Results |
Of 4423 patients with endometrial cancer, 2807 (63.5%) identified as white, 649 (14.7%) Black, 78 (1.8%) Asian, and 964 (21.8%) some other race. Overall, 3.8% of patients with endometrial cancer ever participated in a clinical drug trial. High-risk histology and residence in the Southeast were associated with increased clinical trial participation (risk ratio (RR) 2.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–4.62 and RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.26–5.3 respectively). By race, trial participants included 123 (72.4%) White, 18 (10.6%) Black, 1 (0.59%) Asian, and 28 (16.4%) some other race. While Black patients had the greatest proportion of high-risk histology, they were 50.0% less likely than white patients to participate in a clinical trial (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30–0.83).
Conclusion |
Black patients with endometrial cancer were disproportionately underrepresented in clinical drug trials, despite having higher rates of aggressive cancer histologies. Efforts to increase diversity in endometrial cancer clinical trial participants are needed.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : clinical drug trial participation, endometrial cancer, racial disparity, real-world analyses
Plan
A.J.B.S. and S.S. are the first co-authors of this study. |
|
The authors report no conflict of interest. |
|
Dr Smith's and Mr Heinz's work was funded by grants from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the University of Pennsylvania's Basser Center for BRCA. Mr Spataro's work was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Aging. Neither funder was involved in study design or manuscript submission. |
|
This study was presented at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, e-publication abstract only: Ko EM, Alvarez R, Heintz J, Simpkins F, Smith AJ: Disparities in endometrial cancer clinical drug trial participation. Journal of Clinical Oncology 40(16_suppl): e18514-e18514. June 2022. This study was also presented at the 2023 Mid-Atlantic Gynecological Oncology Society conference, as a poster presentation: Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith, Sebastian Spataro, Jonathan Heintz, Fiona Simpkins, Stefanie Hinkle, Emily M. Ko: Disparities in Clinical Drug Trial Participation in Endometrial Cancer. October 2023. |
|
Cite this article as: Smith AJB, Spataro S, Heintz J, et al. Disparities in clinical drug trial participation in endometrial cancer: a real-world analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;XXX:XX–XX. |
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?