Gender Differences in the Adoption and Utilization of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Among Practicing Urologists: A Study of American Board of Urology Case Logs From 2012-2022 - 05/11/24
Résumé |
Objective |
To evaluate the differential activity in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) by urologic surgeon gender.
Methods |
This was a retrospective study of American Board of Urology surgical case logs from 2012-2022. The CPT-coded laparoscopic procedures included were Partial Nephrectomy (50543), Radical Nephrectomy (50545, 50546, 50548), Pyeloplasty (50544), and Sacrocolpopexy (57425). Robotic-assisted cases were co-coded with CPT S2900. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analyzed the roles of physician gender and other factors on RALS utilization. A separate analysis was performed for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) (55866).
Results |
Women performed 10.8% of all procedures and 9.02% of robotic cases. General Urology and Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) had higher concentrations in women. Of the CPT procedures analyzed, women performed the highest percentage of sacrocolpopexies (39.2% of total), 8.09% of which were robotic. In multivariate regression, women surgeons had significantly lower odds of performing a robotic case compared to men (OR 0.803, P <.001). Endourology, Oncology, Pediatric Urology, and URPS subspecialties were associated with RALS. Upward trends were depicted across all physicians (0.012, [0.007, 0.018], P <.001) and for men (0.019, [0.010, 0.029], P = .001). Women showed no significant increase in robotic usage over time (P = .463).
Conclusion |
Women have lower odds of participating in robotics, primarily specialize in URPS and their involvement in RALS is skewed toward sacrocolpopexy. As robotics continues to dominate surgical urology, ensuring equitable training opportunities is essential. Research into the roles of mentorship in residency, same-gender patient-physician concordance, practice setting, and recent graduates’ referral patterns is warranted.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
This work was supported by The Brown Urology Research Group at Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors |
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?