Intrarenal Pressure in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Narrative Review - 16/10/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.026

Jeff John ^a,^b,^⁎ , Pawel Wisniewski ^c, Graham Fieggen ^d, Lisa Kaestner ^a, John Lazarus ^a
^a Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
^b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Frere Hospital and Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa
^c Hillcrest Private Hospital, Durban, South Africa
^d Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

^⁎Address correspondence to: Jeff John, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Wednesday 16 October 2024

Résumé

Objective

To review the latest evidence on the complications of elevated intrarenal pressures (IRPs) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and the strategies to mitigate the increase of IRP during surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCO research databases was conducted from inception to July 31, 2024. The analysis involved a narrative review.

Results

Normal physiological IRP in an unobstructed kidney ranges from 0 to 15 mmHg (0-20 cmH₂O). During RIRS, dangerous IRPs are often reached, resulting in complications. These include pyelorenal reflux, which predisposes the patient to fever, urosepsis and postoperative pain, and forniceal rupture, which may result in intraoperative bleeding as well as acute kidney injury, postoperative pain, and fluid overload. To maintain safe IRP, outflow should be as close as possible to inflow. Minimizing the irrigation pressure by controlling the flow rate, reducing the pressure of the irrigant fluid, using a ureteral access sheath and maintaining an empty bladder during the procedure and, more recently, using real-time IRP monitoring are appropriate techniques to mitigate unsafe IRPs.

Conclusion

Several complications of RIRS are related to elevated IRPs, which cause pyelorenal backflow and forniceal rupture. Irrigation flow and pressure dynamics drive IRP changes during RIRS. Awareness of these factors will allow urologists to institute strategies to mitigate IRP during RIRS, thereby reducing complications and improving patient outcomes.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.