Bedside right ventricle quantification using three-dimensional echocardiography in children with congenital heart disease: A comparative study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging - 01/10/24
, Clément Karsenty a, b, Ramona Ghenghea a, Yves Dulac a, Eric Bruguiere c, Aitor Guitarte a, Pierrick Pyra a, Philippe Acar aCet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | Accurate quantification of the RV is crucial in CHD. |
• | RV quantification from 3D TTE is feasible in children with CHD. |
• | RV quantification from 3D TTE is accurate compared with MRI. |
• | This technique seems appropriate for the daily follow-up of children with CHD. |
Abstract |
Background |
Accurate quantification of right ventricular (RV) volumes and function is crucial for the management of congenital heart diseases.
Aims |
We aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of bedside analysis using new RV quantification software from three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in children with or without congenital heart disease, and to compare measurements with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Methods |
We included paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (106 patients) responsible for RV volume overload and a control group (30 patients). All patients underwent three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography using a Vivid E95 ultrasound system. RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RV ejection fraction were obtained using RV quantification software. Measurements were compared between RV quantification and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 27 patients.
Results |
Bedside RV quantification analysis was feasible in 133 patients (97.8%). Manual contour adjustment was necessary in 126 patients (93%). The mean time of analysis was 62±42s. RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were larger in the congenital heart disease group than the control group: median 85.0 (interquartile range 29.5) mL/m2 vs 55.0 (interquartile range 20.5) mL/m2 for RV end-diastolic volume and 42.5 (interquartile range 15.3) mL/m2 vs 29.0 (interquartile range 11.8) mL/m2 for RV end-systolic volume, respectively. Good agreement for RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RV ejection fraction was found between RV quantification and magnetic resonance imaging measurements. RV quantification software underestimated RV end-diastolic volume/body surface area by 3mL/m2 and RV ejection fraction by 2.1%, and overestimated RV end-systolic volume/body surface area by 0.2mL/m2.
Conclusions |
We found good feasibility and accuracy of bedside RV quantification analysis from three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in children with or without congenital heart disease. RV quantification could be a reliable and non-invasive method for RV assessment in daily practice, facilitating appropriate management and follow-up care.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Right ventricle, Quantification software, Congenital heart diseases, 3D echocardiography, Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Plan
| ☆ | X post (Tweet): right ventricle quantification from 3D TTE is feasible, accurate and appropriate for the daily follow-up of children with CHD (handle: @drhadeed77). |
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?