Artificial Intelligence to Predict Billing Code Levels of Emergency Department Encounters - 24/09/24
Abstract |
Study objective |
To use artificial intelligence (AI) to predict billing code levels for emergency department (ED) encounters.
Methods |
We accessed ED encounters from our health system from January to September 2023. We developed an ensemble model using natural language processing and machine learning techniques to predict billing codes from clinical notes combined with clinical characteristics and orders. Explainable AI techniques were used to help determine the important model features. The main endpoint was to predict evaluation and management professional billing codes (levels 2 to 5 [Current Procedural Terminology codes 99282 to 99285] and critical care). Secondary endpoints included predicting professional billing codes at different decision boundary thresholds and generalizability of the model at other EDs.
Results |
There were 321,893 adult ED encounters coded at levels 2 (<1%), 3 (5%), 4 (38%), 5 (51%), and critical care (5%). Model performance for professional billing code levels of 4 and 5 yielded area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.94 and 0.95, accuracy values of 0.80 and 0.92, and F1-scores of 0.79 and 0.91, respectively. At a 95% decision boundary threshold, level 5 predicted charts had a precision/positive predictive value of 0.99 and recall/sensitivity of 0.57. The most important features using Shapley Additive Explanations values were critical care note, number of orders, discharge disposition, cardiology, and psychiatry.
Conclusion |
Currently available AI models accurately predict billing code levels for ED encounters based on clinical notes, clinical characteristics, and orders. This has the potential to automate coding of ED encounters and save administrative costs and time.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Please see page XX for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Supervising editor: Stephen Schenkel, MD, MPP. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors. |
|
Author contributions: All authors formulated the study concept and design, data interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. DJ contributed to the data acquisition. JM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
Data sharing statement: The analytic code is available on request by contacting Jacob Morey, MD, MBA, at morey.jacob@mayo.edu. |
|
Authorship: All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals’ policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). This study was conducted without financial support. The authors have no conflict of interest relevant to this article to disclose. |
|
Presentation information: This study was presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Research Forum October 9-12, 2023, Philadelphia, PA. |
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?