S'abonner

Health Care Discrimination Affects Patient Activation, Communication Self-Efficacy, and Pain for Black Americans - 14/09/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104663 
Veronica Derricks *, , Adam T. Hirsh *, Anthony J. Perkins , Joanne K. Daggy , Marianne S. Matthias , §,
 Department of Psychology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 
 Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 
 VA HSR Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 
§ William M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana 
 Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 

Address reprint requests to Veronica Derricks, Department of Psychology, Indiana University Indianapolis, 402 N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN 46202.Department of Psychology, Indiana University Indianapolis402 N Blackford StIndianapolisIN46202
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Saturday 14 September 2024

Abstract

This study examines whether a key psychosocial factor—perceiving racial discrimination in health care—is associated with worse patient activation, communication self-efficacy, and physical health outcomes for Black veterans with chronic pain. Moreover, we explore the role of physician-patient working alliance as a moderator that may alleviate the potential consequences of perceiving racial discrimination. This work is a secondary analysis of baseline data from a clinical trial with 250 U.S. Black veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Participants were recruited from primary care clinics at a Midwestern VA hospital between 2018 and 2021. Perceiving racial discrimination in health care was associated with lower patient activation, lower self-efficacy in communicating with one’s physician, higher pain intensity, and lower pain management self-efficacy (ps < .049) but was unrelated to reports of pain interference or use of pain coping strategies (ps > .157). Although the relationship between perceived discrimination and patient activation was moderated by working alliance (P = .014), having a stronger working alliance improved patient activation to varying degrees across levels of perceived discrimination (rather than buffering against negative outcomes when perceiving higher levels of discrimination). Moderation was not significant on any other measures. This study deepens our understanding of the broad range of health outcomes that are (not) associated with perceiving racial discrimination in health care. Contrary to prior theorizing, this work also indicates that having a strong working alliance does not attenuate the consequences of perceiving discrimination among Black individuals living with pain. These results highlight the need for system-level interventions to address perceptions of racial mistreatment in health care.

Perspective

This work has important public health implications by identifying the broad range of outcomes associated with perceived discrimination in health care among Black Americans. Importantly, a strong physician-patient relationship did not buffer Black individuals from the consequences of perceiving discrimination. These findings inform intervention targets to mitigate racial health disparities.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Perceived racism in health care related to worse patient activation and efficacy with clinicians.
Perceived racism in health care was associated with worse pain intensity and pain self-efficacy.
Perceived racism in health care was unrelated to pain interference or use of pain coping strategies.
A stronger working alliance improved patient activation across levels of perceived racism.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Perceived discrimination, pain, physical health, Black Americans, physician-patient communication


Plan


 Supplementary data accompanying this article are available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com.


© 2024  United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.