S'abonner

A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects of Opaque Bottles on Maternal Sensitivity, Infant Intake, and Infant Weight Status - 19/08/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jand.2024.02.005 
Alison K. Ventura, PhD 1, , Suzanne Phelan, PhD 1, Noemi Alarcon 2, Adilene Quintana Diaz 2, Jeffrey C. Sklar, PhD 3, Chantelle N. Hart, PhD 4
1 Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 
2 Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 
3 Department of Statistics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 
4 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Obesity Research and Education, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 

Address correspondence to: Alison K. Ventura, PhD, Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407.Department of Kinesiology and Public HealthCenter for Health ResearchCalifornia Polytechnic State University1 Grand AveSan Luis ObispoCA93407

Abstract

Background

Conventional clear infant feeding bottles provide visual cues about the amount of milk consumed, which may decrease caregivers’ sensitivity to infant cues, increase infant intake, and lead to greater infant weight gain.

Objective

This study examined feasibility, adherence, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of an intervention in which families received clear vs opaque bottles.

Design

A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial was conducted.

Participants/Setting

Participants included mothers (N = 76) with young infants (2.9 ± 1.4 months old). Data collection occurred between December 2018 and July 2022 and within San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties, California. All assessments occurred within participants’ homes.

Intervention

Participants were randomized to use clear (Clear group, n = 38) or opaque (Opaque group, n = 38) bottles for 12 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures

We assessed feasibility of recruitment and retention, participant perceptions of study bottles, participant adherence to the intervention, maternal sensitivity to cues, infant intake (mL and mL/kg), and infant weight-for-length z-scores (WLZ).

Statistical Analyses Performed

Data were analyzed using linear regression, χ2 analysis, and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Of 842 potential participants, 295 (35%) could not be reached after initial contact, 166 (20%) declined to participate, and 305 (36%) were ineligible. Of those who declined, 16 (10%) declined because they did not want to use study bottles. No differences were observed for loss to follow-up for Clear (8 of 38; 21%) vs Opaque (5 of 38; 13%) groups (P = 0.36) or for reported use of assigned bottles for Clear (89.8% ± 24.5% of daily feedings) vs Opaque (90.1% ± 22.1%) groups (P = 0.96). No group differences were observed for sensitivity to cues (P = 0.52) or intake (mL, P = 0.53 or mL/kg, P = 0.56) at follow-up. Opaque group infants had lower WLZ at follow-up compared with Clear group infants (mean difference, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.08, 0.86; ηp2 = 0.17), adjusting for baseline WLZ.

Conclusions

Relative to providing clear bottles, providing families with opaque bottles appeared feasible and acceptable, with good adherence. Although preliminary, study findings suggest the potential of opaque bottles to support healthier weight outcomes for bottle-fed infants.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Bottle-feeding, Infant feeding, Responsive feeding, Infant weight status, Obesity prevention


Plan


 STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST A. K. V. consults for the Avocado Nutrition Science Advisory and has research funding from Bobbie Baby, Inc. S. P. has a grant from WeightWatchers, International and is a paid consultant with Education Initiatives. None of the named entities provided financial support for this study, nor did they have any influence on the methods in this study. The other authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
 FUNDING/SUPPORT This research was supported by National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21 HD096236. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank the families who participated in this study. We thank Dr. Kara Bryden for her contributions as a data safety monitor. We also acknowledge Sammy Eaddy, Charlotte Bullard, Nicolette Hausman, Stephanie Lechuga, Karla Ceja, Katy Harrison, Layla Burack, and Annika Dalstrom for their contributions to the analysis of study video records and qualitative data.
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS A. K. V., S. P., and C. N. H. designed the study. A. K. V. and S. P. oversaw data collection. N. A. and A. Q. D. collected the data. A. K. V. and J. C. S. analyzed the data. A. K. V. wrote the first draft of the manuscript with contributions from all authors. All authors reviewed and commented on subsequent drafts of the manuscript.
 Supplementary materials: Supplemental Table 2 is available at www.jandonline.org. Podcast available at content.podcast.


© 2024  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 124 - N° 9

P. 1149 - septembre 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Maternity Dietitians’ Perspectives on Delivering Gestational Diabetes Care, and Postpartum Follow-Up in Ireland: A Qualitative Study
  • Pauline Dunne, Márcia Carvalho, Molly Byrne, Andrew W. Murphy, Sharleen O’Reilly
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Communication Skills: A Scoping Review of Experiences, Perceptions, and Use in Dietetics Practice
  • Annemarie Knight, Claire Palermo, Gabriel Reedy, Kevin Whelan

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.