S'abonner

“It frees your body from that pain thought”: A mixed-methods exploration of patterns, contexts, and experiences of cannabis use for pain in rural communities - 08/08/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104636 
Emily Warner *, , Desiree Azizoddin , , Summer G. Frank-Pearce , §, Lance Ford , David Bradley , Amy M. Cohn , , Michael Businelle , , Paul Spicer , Hannah Appleseth *, , Julia McQuoid , ,
* Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 
 TSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 
 Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 
§ Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 
 Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 
 Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 

Address reprint requests to Julia McQuoid, PhD, TSET Health Promotion Research Center & Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 655 Research Parkway, Suite 100, Oklahoma City, OK 73104.TSET Health Promotion Research Center & Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center655 Research Parkway, Suite 100Oklahoma CityOK73104
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Thursday 08 August 2024

Abstract

U.S. adults increasingly report using cannabis to manage chronic pain and rural areas have inadequate comprehensive pain management. Using mixed methods, we aimed to understand how and why some rural adults use cannabis for pain, including within the context of co-use with opioids. Participants (N = 14, Oklahoma) were rural-dwelling adults who used tobacco and ≥1 other substance, including cannabis and opioids, ≥3 days per week. Participants completed 14 days of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) regarding substance use and subsequent in-depth interviews discussing maps of their substance use reports. Half (7/14) described cannabis use for chronic pain, and most of these (85%) reported use on ≥75% of EMA days. The most frequently reported cannabis use motive was therapeutic/medicinal (90% of use reports). Most reports were of combusted cannabis (88% of use reports) at home (99% of use reports). Same-day use of cannabis and opioids was relatively common (45% of daily surveys), but seemingly not within close temporal proximity. Interview narratives characterized cannabis as modifying pain-adjacent factors (eg, thoughts), not eliminating pain itself. They recounted using a repertoire of substances to manage different pain dimensions (eg, intensity, quality) and balance perceived trade-offs of different substances. Participants described high medical cannabis access, low pain specialist access, and most physicians as unwilling to discuss cannabis for pain. The findings suggest that rural-dwelling patients could benefit from increased access to comprehensive pain management, having cannabis addressed within pain management provider discussions, and that risks and benefits of cannabis use for pain must be better established.

Perspective

This study used a geographically explicit EMA mixed method to gather rich, intensive pilot data on cannabis use and co-use for chronic pain in rural Oklahoma. It provides unique insights to inform future research on cannabis use among a vulnerable and understudied subgroup of adults with pain—rural residents.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Rural U.S. communities lack comprehensive pain management services and have high rates of pain.
Rural Oklahoma has these characteristics as well as high access to medical cannabis.
A mixed-methods study examined cannabis use and co-use for pain in rural Oklahoma.
Increased access to comprehensive pain management in rural areas is needed.
Cannabis should be addressed in patient-clinician pain management discussions in rural areas.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key Words : Marijuana, pain, rural, opioids, co-use


Plan


 Supplementary data accompanying this article are available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com.


© 2024  United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.