Concordance Between Electronic Health Record-Recorded Race and Ethnicity and Patient Report in Emergency Department Patients - 18/07/24
Abstract |
Objective |
We assessed the concordance of patient-reported race and ethnicity for emergency department (ED) patients compared with what was recorded in the electronic health record.
Methods |
We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study of 744 ED patients (English- and/or Spanish-speaking), asking them to describe their race and ethnicity. We compared the distributions of ethnicity and race between patient-reported and electronic health record data using McNemar’s test. We calculated percent agreement and Cohen’s kappa, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the concordance of patient-reported race and ethnicity with electronic health record data.
Results |
Of 744 ED patients, 731 participants who completed the survey reported their ethnicity, resulting in 98.2% of electronic health records obtained ethnicities matched self-reported data (kappa = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98). For those who self-reported as Hispanic, only 92.3% agreement was observed between the self-reported and electronic health record values. For all patients who had race recorded, 85.4% agreement was observed (kappa = 0.75; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). High rates of agreement were observed for Black or African American patients (98.7%) and White patients (96.6%), with low rates for those who identified as “More than one race” (22.9%) or “Other” race (1.8%). In the subset of Hispanic patients, low rates of agreement (25.0%) were observed for race (kappa = 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.19).
Conclusions |
Documentation discordance regarding race and ethnicity exists between electronic health records and self-reported data for our ED patients, particularly for ethnically Hispanic and Latino/a patients. Future efforts should focus on ensuring that demographic information in the electronic health record is accurately collected.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Please see page 112 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Supervising editor: Lois K. Lee, MD, MPH. Specific detailed information about possible conflicts of interest for individual editors is available at editors. |
|
Author contributions: JV, PM, and NP conceived the study. JV conducted the survey and data collection. KL and XL provided statistical advice and analyzed the data. NP drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revisions. NP takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
Data sharing statement: Partial or complete datasets and data dictionary are available upon request to Dr. Joshua Vest at Joshvest@iu.edu to investigators who provide an IRB letter of approval. |
|
Authorship: All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals’ policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors report no such relationships. The study did not receive any funding. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 84 - N° 2
P. 111-117 - août 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?