S'abonner

Drug effectiveness of 2nd and 3rd TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis – relationship with the reason for withdrawal from the previous treatment - 11/07/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105729 
Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg a, 1, , Cecilie Heegaard Brahe a, 1, Louise Linde a, Lennart Jacobsson c, Michael J. Nissen d, Eirik Klami Kristianslund e, Maria José Santos f, Dan Nordström g, Ziga Rotar h, Bjorn Gudbjornsson i, Fatos Onen j, Catalin Codreanu k, Ulf Lindström c, Burkhard Möller l, Tore K. Kvien e, Anabela Barcelos m, Kari K. Eklund n, Matija Tomšič h, Thorvardur Jon Love o, Gercek Can j, Ruxandra Ionescu k, Anne Gitte Loft b, p, Herman Mann q, Karel Pavelka q, Marleen van de Sande r, s, I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma t, Manuel Pombo Suarez u, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra v, Gary J. Macfarlane w, Florenzo Iannone x, Brigitte Michelsen a, d, y, Lise Hejl Hyldstrup a, Niels Steen Krogh z, Mikkel Østergaard a, aa, 2, Merete Lund Hetland a, aa, 2
a Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark 
b DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark 
c Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 
d Department of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland 
e Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 
f Reuma.pt registry; Department of Rheumatology–Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal 
g ROB-FIN Registry, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland 
h biorx.si and the Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 
i Centre for Rheumatology Research (ICEBIO), University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland 
j TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey 
k Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania 
l Leitender Arzt der Universitätsklinik für Rheumatologie, Immunologie und Allergologie Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland 
m Reuma.pt registry, Rheumatology Department - Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro and Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal 
n Inflammation Center, Department of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland 
o University of Iceland, Faculty of Medicine, and Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland 
p Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark 
q Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 
r Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 
s Amsterdam Rheumatology & immunology Center (ARC), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 
t Radboudumc, Department of Rheumatology, PO box 9101, 6500 Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands 
u Rheumatology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain 
v Health Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain 
w Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group) University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom 
x GISEA registry, Rheumatology Unit–DETO, University of Bari, Bari, Italy 
y Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristianssand, Norway 
z Zitelabs Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark 
aa Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 

Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 17, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.RigshospitaletValdemar Hansens Vej 17Glostrup2600Denmark

Highlights

Effectiveness of a 2nd and 3rd TNFi treatment in PsA patients was lower than what has previously been reported for the 1st TNFi treatment.
Initiation of a 2nd or 3rd TNFi treatment in clinical practice led to DAS28 remission in a substantial number of PsA patients.
Similar drug effectiveness was observed in patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE compared to overall LOE, while better drug effectiveness was found in patients who had stopped the previous TNF due to secondary LOE compared to primary LOE.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Objective

To investigate real-world retention and remission rates in PsA patients initiating a 2nd or 3rd TNFi and the association with reason for discontinuation from the previous TNFi-treatment.

Methods

Prospectively collected routine care data from 12 European registries were pooled. Retention rates (Kaplan-Meier estimation) and crude/LUNDEX-adjusted rates of Disease Activity Score 28 and Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAS28 and DAPSA28) remission were calculated and compared with adjusted Cox regression analyses and Chi-squared test, respectively).

Results

We included 5233 (2nd TNFi) and 1906 (3rd TNFi) patients. Twelve-month retention rates for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi were 68% (95%CI: 67–70%) and 66% (64–68%), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE/LOE had 12-month retention rates of 66%/65% (2nd TNFi), and 65%/63% (3rd TNFi), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to LOE after less vs more than 24 weeks had 12-month retention rates of 54%/69% (2nd TNFi), and 58%/65% (3rd TNFi). Six-month crude/LUNDEX-adjusted DAS28 remission rates were 48%/35% and 38%/27%, and DAPSA28 remission rates were 19%/14% and 14%/10%, for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi.

Conclusion

Two-thirds of patients remained on TNFi at 12months for both the 2nd and 3rd TNFi, while one-third and one-quarter of patients were in DAS28 remission after 6months on the 2nd and 3rd TNFi. While drug effectiveness was similar in patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE compared to overall LOE, drug effectiveness was better in patients who had stopped the previous TNF due to secondary LOE compared to primary LOE.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Psoriatic arthritis, TNF-inhibitors, Epidemiology, Treatment withdrawal


Plan


© 2024  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 91 - N° 4

Article 105729- juillet 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Retention of triple therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine compared to combination methotrexate and leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis
  • Sankalp Virendrakumar Bhavsar, Mohammad Movahedi, Angela Cesta, Janet E. Pope, Claire Bombardier, other OBRI investigators
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Monosodium urate crystal depletion and bone erosion remodeling during pegloticase treatment in patients with uncontrolled gout: Exploratory dual-energy computed tomography findings from MIRROR RCT
  • Nicola Dalbeth, John Botson, Kenneth Saag, Ada Kumar, Lissa Padnick-Silver, Brian LaMoreaux, Fabio Becce

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.