Retention of triple therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine compared to combination methotrexate and leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis - 11/07/24
other OBRI investigators
Highlights |
• | Patients on triple csDMARD therapy (MTX+ HCQ+ SSZ) remained on treatment longer than patients on double csDMARD therapy (MTX+LEF). However, this difference was not statistically significant. |
• | Compared to double csDMARD therapy (MTX+LEF), triple csDMARD therapy (MTX +HCQ+SSZ) was more likely to be associated with reaching low-disease activity including remission at 6 months after treatment initiation. |
• | Female patients and patients with at least one comorbidity were more likely to discontinue therapy. |
• | This study provides practical evidence that can be used in routine patient care. |
Abstract |
Objective |
There are various combination conventional synthetic disease-modifying-antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) treatment strategies used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A commonly used csDMARD combination is triple therapy with methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Another approach is double therapy with MTX and leflunomide (LEF). We compared the real-world retention of these two treatment combinations.
Methods |
Patients with RA from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) who received triple or double therapy on or after OBRI enrolment were included. Retention rates were compared between these two groups. We also analyzed which medication in the combination was discontinued and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. Disease activity was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation as well as at time of discontinuation. Risk factors for treatment discontinuation were also examined.
Results |
Six hundred and ninety-two patients were included (258 triple and 434 double therapy). There were 175 (67.8%) discontinuations in the triple therapy group and 287 (66.1%) discontinuations in patients on double therapy. The median survival for triple therapy was longer (15.1 months; 95% CI: 11.2–21.2) compared to double therapy (9.6 months; 95%CI: 7.03–12.2). However, this was not statistically significant. Disease activity at 6 and 12 months, measured by 28-joint count Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was lower with triple therapy (mean DAS28 at 6 months 3.4 vs. 3.9, P<0.0001 and at 12 months 3.2 vs. 3.5, P=0.0005).
Conclusion |
Patients on triple therapy remained on treatment longer than patients on double therapy. However, this difference was not statistically significant.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Rheumatoid arthritis, csDMARDs, Retention, Discontinuation, Disease activity, Real-world data
Plan
Vol 91 - N° 4
Article 105732- juillet 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?