S'abonner

Retention of triple therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine compared to combination methotrexate and leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis - 11/07/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105732 
Sankalp Virendrakumar Bhavsar a, Mohammad Movahedi b, c, , Angela Cesta b, Janet E. Pope d, Claire Bombardier b, c

other OBRI investigators

a 407-672, Brant Street, Burlington, Ontario, ON, Canada 
b Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI), Toronto General Research Institute University Health Network, Toronto, Canada 
c Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
d Saint-Joseph's Health Care, 268, Grosvenor St, London, ON, Canada 

*Corresponding author: Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI), Toronto General Research Institute University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI), Toronto General Research Institute University Health NetworkTorontoCanada

Highlights

Patients on triple csDMARD therapy (MTX+ HCQ+ SSZ) remained on treatment longer than patients on double csDMARD therapy (MTX+LEF). However, this difference was not statistically significant.
Compared to double csDMARD therapy (MTX+LEF), triple csDMARD therapy (MTX +HCQ+SSZ) was more likely to be associated with reaching low-disease activity including remission at 6 months after treatment initiation.
Female patients and patients with at least one comorbidity were more likely to discontinue therapy.
This study provides practical evidence that can be used in routine patient care.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Objective

There are various combination conventional synthetic disease-modifying-antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) treatment strategies used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A commonly used csDMARD combination is triple therapy with methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Another approach is double therapy with MTX and leflunomide (LEF). We compared the real-world retention of these two treatment combinations.

Methods

Patients with RA from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) who received triple or double therapy on or after OBRI enrolment were included. Retention rates were compared between these two groups. We also analyzed which medication in the combination was discontinued and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. Disease activity was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation as well as at time of discontinuation. Risk factors for treatment discontinuation were also examined.

Results

Six hundred and ninety-two patients were included (258 triple and 434 double therapy). There were 175 (67.8%) discontinuations in the triple therapy group and 287 (66.1%) discontinuations in patients on double therapy. The median survival for triple therapy was longer (15.1 months; 95% CI: 11.2–21.2) compared to double therapy (9.6 months; 95%CI: 7.03–12.2). However, this was not statistically significant. Disease activity at 6 and 12 months, measured by 28-joint count Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was lower with triple therapy (mean DAS28 at 6 months 3.4 vs. 3.9, P<0.0001 and at 12 months 3.2 vs. 3.5, P=0.0005).

Conclusion

Patients on triple therapy remained on treatment longer than patients on double therapy. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Rheumatoid arthritis, csDMARDs, Retention, Discontinuation, Disease activity, Real-world data


Plan


© 2024  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 91 - N° 4

Article 105732- juillet 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Sexual dysfunction in male patients treated with methorexate for arthritis: Analysis of the IIEF5 questionnaire and hormonal status
  • Francesco Natalucci, Sandra Bisseron, Tatiana Sokolova, Aleksandra Avramovska, Dominique Maiter, Patrick Durez
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Drug effectiveness of 2nd and 3rd TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis – relationship with the reason for withdrawal from the previous treatment
  • Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Cecilie Heegaard Brahe, Louise Linde, Lennart Jacobsson, Michael J. Nissen, Eirik Klami Kristianslund, Maria José Santos, Dan Nordström, Ziga Rotar, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Fatos Onen, Catalin Codreanu, Ulf Lindström, Burkhard Möller, Tore K. Kvien, Anabela Barcelos, Kari K. Eklund, Matija Tomšič, Thorvardur Jon Love, Gercek Can, Ruxandra Ionescu, Anne Gitte Loft, Herman Mann, Karel Pavelka, Marleen van de Sande, I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, Manuel Pombo Suarez, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra, Gary J. Macfarlane, Florenzo Iannone, Brigitte Michelsen, Lise Hejl Hyldstrup, Niels Steen Krogh, Mikkel Østergaard, Merete Lund Hetland

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.