Significant Disagreement Between Conventional Parameters and 3D Echocardiography-Derived Ejection Fraction in the Detection of Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Its Association With Outcomes - 03/07/24
Abstract |
Aims |
Conventional echocardiographic parameters such as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and free-wall longitudinal strain (FWLS) offer limited insights into the complexity of right ventricular (RV) systolic function, while 3D echocardiography-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF) enables a comprehensive assessment. We investigated the discordance between TAPSE, FAC, FWLS, and RVEF in RV systolic function grading and associated outcomes.
Methods |
We analyzed two- and three-dimensional echocardiography data from 2 centers including 750 patients followed up for all-cause mortality. Right ventricular dysfunction was defined as RVEF <45%, with guideline-recommended thresholds (TAPSE <17 mm, FAC <35%, FWLS >−20%) considered.
Results |
Among patients with normal RVEF, significant proportions exhibited impaired TAPSE (21%), FAC (33%), or FWLS (8%). Conversely, numerous patients with reduced RVEF had normal TAPSE (46%), FAC (26%), or FWLS (41%). Using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, FWLS exhibited the highest area under the curve of discrimination for RV dysfunction (RVEF <45%) with 59% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Over a median 3.7-year follow-up, 15% of patients died. Univariable Cox regression identified TAPSE, FAC, FWLS, and RVEF as significant mortality predictors. Combining impaired conventional parameters showed that outcomes are the worst if at least 2 parameters are impaired and gradually better if only one or none of them are impaired (log-rank P < .005).
Conclusion |
Guideline-recommended cutoff values of conventional echocardiographic parameters of RV systolic function are only modestly associated with RVEF-based assessment. Impaired values of FWLS showed the closest association with the RVEF cutoff. Our results emphasize a multiparametric approach in the assessment of RV function, especially if 3D echocardiography is not available.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Outline and outcome measures of our study. FAC, Fractional area change; FWLS, free-wall longitudinal strain; RV, right ventricle; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
Central IllustrationOutline and outcome measures of our study. FAC, Fractional area change; FWLS, free-wall longitudinal strain; RV, right ventricle; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Highlights |
• | RV dysfunction cutoffs of 2D echo parameters are modestly associated with RVEF ˂45%. |
• | RVEF-based reclassification of RV dysfunction is associated with different outcomes. |
• | Impaired values of FWLS show the closest association with the RVEF cutoff. |
• | A multiparametric approach is the preferred option when 3D echo is not available. |
Keywords : 2D echocardiography, 3D echocardiography, Right ventricular ejection fraction, Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, Free-wall longitudinal strain, Fractional area change
Abbreviations : 2D, 3D, 3DE, ACS, AUC, DCM, EDAi, EDVi, EF, ESAi, ESVi, FAC, FWLS, HR, HTX, ICD, LV, ROC, RV, RVEF, RVSP, SVi, TAPSE
Plan
Drs. Tolvaj and Kovács contributed equally to this work. Drs. Badano and Surkova contributed equally to this work. |
|
Lawrence Rudski, MD, served as guest editor for this article. |
Vol 37 - N° 7
P. 677-686 - juillet 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?