The opioid pandemic, and particularly injection drug use, has led to an increase in cases of tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. Indications for valve surgery in right-sided infective endocarditis are not well-defined. Percutaneous mechanical aspiration is considered an alternative in patients at high risk for re-infection of a prosthetic valve but lacks robust outcomes data.

This retrospective analysis compares the primary outcome of death within 1 year for patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis treated with medical therapy alone vs percutaneous mechanical aspiration or valve surgery.

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis over a 10-year period. Medical record review was performed to collect demographic-and outcomes-related data. The association between treatment group and outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018, 215 patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis and surgical indications were identified. One hundred patients (46.5%) were managed medically, 49 (22.8%) were managed surgically, and 66 (30.7%) underwent percutaneous mechanical aspiration. There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between the 3 treatment groups (P = .15). Vegetation size > 2.0 cm was associated with increased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 3.01; P = .03). Addiction medicine consultation was associated with decreased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.117; P = .0008).

The study highlights that surgery or percutaneous mechanical aspiration in addition to medical therapy does not improve 1-year mortality in patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. Addiction medicine consultation was associated with decreased 1-year mortality in patients with injection drug use-associated isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis.