S'abonner

Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation in Mitral Valve Prolapse by Three-Dimensional Vena Contracta Area: Derived Cutoff Values and Comparison With Two-Dimensional Multiparametric Approach - 03/06/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.echo.2024.03.009 
Giorgio Fiore, MD a, Giacomo Ingallina, MD a, Francesco Ancona, MD a, Carlo Gaspardone, MD a, Federico Biondi, MD a, Davide Margonato, MD a, Michele Morosato, MD a, Martina Belli, MD a, Annamaria Tavernese, MD a, Stefano Stella, MD a, Eustachio Agricola, MD a, b,
a Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy 
b Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy 

Reprint requests: Eustachio Agricola, MD, FESC, FEACVI, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular DepartmentSan Raffaele University HospitalIRCCSMilanItaly

Abstract

Background

Echocardiographic grading of mitral regurgitation (MR) in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is challenging. Three-dimensional (3D) vena contracta area (VCA) has been proposed as a valuable method. However, data defining the cutoff values of severity and validation in the subset of patients with MVP are scarce. The aim of this study was to validate the 3D VCA by 3D color-Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with MVP and to define the cutoff values of severity grading. The secondary aim was to compare 3D VCA to the effective regurgitant orifice area estimation by proximal isovelocity surface area (EROA-PISA) method.

Methods

A total of 1,138 patients with at least moderate MR who underwent TEE were included. Three-dimensional VCA was measured, and the cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of severe MR were estimated by receiver operating characteristic curve using a guideline-suggested multiparametric approach as the reference standard. In a subgroup of patients, 3D regurgitant volume (RV) and 3D fraction were calculated from mitral and left ventricular outflow tract stroke volumes to further validate 3D VCA against a 3D volumetric reference standard.

Results

The optimal 3D VCA cutoff value for predicting severe MR was 0.45 cm2 (specificity, 0.87; sensitivity, 0.90) with an AUC of 0.95 using a multiparametric approach as reference. Three-dimensional VCA had a good linear correlation with EROA-PISA (r = 0.62, P < .05) with larger values compared to EROA-PISA (0.63 cm2 vs 0.44 cm2, P < .05). A cutoff of 0.50 cm2 (AUC of 0.84; sensitivity, 0.78; specificity, 0.78) predicts an EROA-PISA of 0.40 cm2. Three-dimensional VCA had a good linear correlation with 3D RV (r = 0.56, P < .01), with an AUC of 0.86 to predict a 3D fraction >50%.

Conclusions

The present study suggests 0.45 cm2 as the best cutoff value of 3D VCA to define severe MR in patients with MVP, showing an optimal agreement with the reference standard multiparametric approach and 3D RV.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Central Illustration

From the cohort of included patients with MVP, a multiparametric approach suggested by current guidelines was adopted to grade MR and stratify patients into the moderate or severe group. Subsequently, 3D VCA was blindly reconstructed using 3D TEE color Doppler datasets. Agreement with the multiparametric approach was then assessed using ROC curves, and the optimal cutoff was established. Additionally, a comparison between 3D VCA and EROA-PISA was conducted. Three-dimensional VCA demonstrated optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach (AUC = 0.95), with the best cutoff value for severe MR set at >0.45 cm2. This cutoff value was also tested against the 3D RF > 50% calculated from 3D Doppler stroke volumes.



Central Illustration : 

From the cohort of included patients with MVP, a multiparametric approach suggested by current guidelines was adopted to grade MR and stratify patients into the moderate or severe group. Subsequently, 3D VCA was blindly reconstructed using 3D TEE color Doppler datasets. Agreement with the multiparametric approach was then assessed using ROC curves, and the optimal cutoff was established. Additionally, a comparison between 3D VCA and EROA-PISA was conducted. Three-dimensional VCA demonstrated optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach (AUC = 0.95), with the best cutoff value for severe MR set at >0.45 cm2. This cutoff value was also tested against the 3D RF > 50% calculated from 3D Doppler stroke volumes.


Central IllustrationFrom the cohort of included patients with MVP, a multiparametric approach suggested by current guidelines was adopted to grade MR and stratify patients into the moderate or severe group. Subsequently, 3D VCA was blindly reconstructed using 3D TEE color Doppler datasets. Agreement with the multiparametric approach was then assessed using ROC curves, and the optimal cutoff was established. Additionally, a comparison between 3D VCA and EROA-PISA was conducted. Three-dimensional VCA demonstrated optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach (AUC = 0.95), with the best cutoff value for severe MR set at >0.45 cm2. This cutoff value was also tested against the 3D RF > 50% calculated from 3D Doppler stroke volumes.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

3D VCA can overcome limitations of 2D echocardiography in MR grading.
Cutoff values for severity grading of 3D VCA have not been determined yet.
3D VCA showed optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach for MR grading.
3D VCA produces larger values compared to EROA-PISA method.
We present cutoff values of 3D VCA for MR quantification in patients with MVP.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Transesophageal echocardiography, 3D vena contracta area, EROA PISA, Mitral regurgitation, Mitral valve prolapse

Abbreviations : 2D, 3D, 3DSV, AUC, EROA, LA, LV, LVOT, MA, MR, MVP, PASP, PISA, RF, RV, ROC, TAPSE, TEE, TTE, VC, VCA, VTI


Plan


© 2024  American Society of Echocardiography. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 37 - N° 6

P. 591-598 - juin 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Is It Finally Time to Untangle Elite Athletes From the Controversial Web of Left Ventricular Trabeculations?
  • Bradley S. Lander, Brian D. Hoit
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The Promise and Pitfalls of Three-Dimensional Vena Contracta for Mitral Regurgitation
  • Shantel Brissett, Gerard P. Aurigemma, Matthew W. Parker

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.