Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation in Mitral Valve Prolapse by Three-Dimensional Vena Contracta Area: Derived Cutoff Values and Comparison With Two-Dimensional Multiparametric Approach - 03/06/24
Abstract |
Background |
Echocardiographic grading of mitral regurgitation (MR) in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is challenging. Three-dimensional (3D) vena contracta area (VCA) has been proposed as a valuable method. However, data defining the cutoff values of severity and validation in the subset of patients with MVP are scarce. The aim of this study was to validate the 3D VCA by 3D color-Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with MVP and to define the cutoff values of severity grading. The secondary aim was to compare 3D VCA to the effective regurgitant orifice area estimation by proximal isovelocity surface area (EROA-PISA) method.
Methods |
A total of 1,138 patients with at least moderate MR who underwent TEE were included. Three-dimensional VCA was measured, and the cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of severe MR were estimated by receiver operating characteristic curve using a guideline-suggested multiparametric approach as the reference standard. In a subgroup of patients, 3D regurgitant volume (RV) and 3D fraction were calculated from mitral and left ventricular outflow tract stroke volumes to further validate 3D VCA against a 3D volumetric reference standard.
Results |
The optimal 3D VCA cutoff value for predicting severe MR was 0.45 cm2 (specificity, 0.87; sensitivity, 0.90) with an AUC of 0.95 using a multiparametric approach as reference. Three-dimensional VCA had a good linear correlation with EROA-PISA (r = 0.62, P < .05) with larger values compared to EROA-PISA (0.63 cm2 vs 0.44 cm2, P < .05). A cutoff of 0.50 cm2 (AUC of 0.84; sensitivity, 0.78; specificity, 0.78) predicts an EROA-PISA of 0.40 cm2. Three-dimensional VCA had a good linear correlation with 3D RV (r = 0.56, P < .01), with an AUC of 0.86 to predict a 3D fraction >50%.
Conclusions |
The present study suggests 0.45 cm2 as the best cutoff value of 3D VCA to define severe MR in patients with MVP, showing an optimal agreement with the reference standard multiparametric approach and 3D RV.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Central Illustration |
From the cohort of included patients with MVP, a multiparametric approach suggested by current guidelines was adopted to grade MR and stratify patients into the moderate or severe group. Subsequently, 3D VCA was blindly reconstructed using 3D TEE color Doppler datasets. Agreement with the multiparametric approach was then assessed using ROC curves, and the optimal cutoff was established. Additionally, a comparison between 3D VCA and EROA-PISA was conducted. Three-dimensional VCA demonstrated optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach (AUC = 0.95), with the best cutoff value for severe MR set at >0.45 cm2. This cutoff value was also tested against the 3D RF > 50% calculated from 3D Doppler stroke volumes.
From the cohort of included patients with MVP, a multiparametric approach suggested by current guidelines was adopted to grade MR and stratify patients into the moderate or severe group. Subsequently, 3D VCA was blindly reconstructed using 3D TEE color Doppler datasets. Agreement with the multiparametric approach was then assessed using ROC curves, and the optimal cutoff was established. Additionally, a comparison between 3D VCA and EROA-PISA was conducted. Three-dimensional VCA demonstrated optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach (AUC = 0.95), with the best cutoff value for severe MR set at >0.45 cm2. This cutoff value was also tested against the 3D RF > 50% calculated from 3D Doppler stroke volumes.
Central IllustrationFrom the cohort of included patients with MVP, a multiparametric approach suggested by current guidelines was adopted to grade MR and stratify patients into the moderate or severe group. Subsequently, 3D VCA was blindly reconstructed using 3D TEE color Doppler datasets. Agreement with the multiparametric approach was then assessed using ROC curves, and the optimal cutoff was established. Additionally, a comparison between 3D VCA and EROA-PISA was conducted. Three-dimensional VCA demonstrated optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach (AUC = 0.95), with the best cutoff value for severe MR set at >0.45 cm2. This cutoff value was also tested against the 3D RF > 50% calculated from 3D Doppler stroke volumes.Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Highlights |
• | 3D VCA can overcome limitations of 2D echocardiography in MR grading. |
• | Cutoff values for severity grading of 3D VCA have not been determined yet. |
• | 3D VCA showed optimal agreement with the multiparametric approach for MR grading. |
• | 3D VCA produces larger values compared to EROA-PISA method. |
• | We present cutoff values of 3D VCA for MR quantification in patients with MVP. |
Keywords : Transesophageal echocardiography, 3D vena contracta area, EROA PISA, Mitral regurgitation, Mitral valve prolapse
Abbreviations : 2D, 3D, 3DSV, AUC, EROA, LA, LV, LVOT, MA, MR, MVP, PASP, PISA, RF, RV, ROC, TAPSE, TEE, TTE, VC, VCA, VTI
Plan
Vol 37 - N° 6
P. 591-598 - juin 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?