S'abonner

Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound for acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis - 28/05/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.03.021 
Frances M. Russell, MD a, , Nicholas E. Harrison, MD, MSc a, Oliver Hobson b, Nicholas Montelauro c, Cecelia J. Vetter, MLIS d, Daniel Brenner, MD, PhD a, Sarah Kennedy, MD a, Benton R. Hunter, MD a
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Ave, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America 
b Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America 
d Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Emergency Medicine Offices, Indiana University School of Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Avenue, FOB, 3rd Floor, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.720 Eskenazi Avenue, FOB, 3rd FloorIndianapolisIN46202United States of America

Abstract

Background

Lung ultrasound (LUS) reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of LUS for ADHF in the prehospital setting.

Methods

We performed a keyword search of multiple databases from inception through June 1, 2023. Included studies were those enrolling prehospital patients with undifferentiated dyspnea or suspected ADHF, and specifically diagnostic studies comparing prehospital LUS to a gold standard and intervention studies with a non-US comparator group. Title and abstract screening, full text review, risk of bias (ROB) assessments, and data extraction were performed by multiple authors. and adjudicated. The primary outcome was pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LR) for prehospital LUS. A test-treatment threshold of 0.7 was applied based on prior ADHF literature in the ED. Intervention outcomes included mortality, mechanical ventilation, and time to HF specific treatment.

Results

Eight diagnostic studies (n = 691) and two intervention studies (n = 70) met inclusion criteria. No diagnostic studies were low-ROB. Both intervention studies were critical-ROB, and not pooled. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of prehospital LUS for ADHF were 86.7% (95%CI:70.8%–94.6%) and 87.5% (78.2%–93.2%), respectively, with similar performance by physician vs. paramedic LUS and number of lung zones evaluated. Pooled LR+ and LR- were 7.27 (95% CI: 3.69–13.10) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06–0.34), respectively. Area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.922. At the observed 42.4% ADHF prevalence (pre-test probability), positive pre-hospital LUS exceeded the 70% threshold to initiate treatment (post-test probability 84%, 80–88%).

Conclusions

LUS had similar diagnostic test characteristics for ADHF diagnosis in the prehospital setting as in the ED. A positive prehospital LUS may be sufficient to initiate early ADHF treatment based on published test-treatment thresholds. More studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of prehospital LUS.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Prehospital, Diagnosis, Acute heart failure, Shortness of breath, Systematic review


Plan


© 2024  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 80

P. 91-98 - juin 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Advances in pediatric emergency from 2023
  • Joshua S. Easter, Emily Rose
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The critical care literature 2022
  • Michael E. Winters, Kami Hu, Joseph P. Martinez, Haney Mallemat, William J. Brady

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.