S'abonner

Preoperative free access to water compared to fasting for planned cesarean under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial - 13/04/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.018 
Yee Ling Ng, MObGyn a, Sabeetha Segaran, MObGyn a, Carolyn Chue Wai Yim, MMed (Anesthesia), Fellowship Obstetric Anesthesia b, Boon Kiong Lim, MRCOG a, Mukhri Hamdan, MObGyn, PhD a, Farah Gan, MObGyn a, Peng Chiong Tan, FRCOG, PhD a,
a Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 
b Anesthesia, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 

Corresponding author: Peng Chiong Tan, FRCOG, PhD.
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Saturday 13 April 2024

Abstract

Background

Contemporary guidance for preoperative feeding allows solids up to 6 hours and clear fluids up to 2 hours before anesthesia. Clinical trial evidence to support this approach for cesarean delivery is lacking. Many medical practitioners continue to follow conservative policies of no intake from midnight to the time of surgery, especially in pregnant women.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the pragmatic approach of permitting free access to water up to the call to dispatch to the operating theater vs fasting from midnight in preoperative oral intake restriction for planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia on perioperative vomiting and maternal satisfaction.

Study Design

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the obstetrical unit of the University of Malaya Medical Centre from October 2020 to May 2022. A total of 504 participants scheduled for planned cesarean delivery were randomized: 252 undergoing preoperative free access to water up to the call to dispatch to the operating theater (intervention group) and 252 undergoing fasting from midnight (fasting arm). The primary outcomes were perioperative vomiting and maternal satisfaction. Analyses were performed using t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test, as appropriate.

Results

Of note, 9 of 252 patients (3.6%) in the intervention group and 24 of 252 patients (9.5%) in the control group had vomiting at up to 6 hours after completion of cesarean delivery (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–0.79; P=.007), and the maternal satisfaction scores (0–10 visual numerical rating scale) were 9 (interquartile range, 8–10) in the intervention group and 5 (interquartile range, 3–7) in the control group (P<.001). Assessed before dispatch to the operating theater, feeling of thirst was reported by 69 of 252 patients (27.4%) in the intervention group and 134 of 252 patients (53.2%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.65; P<.001), capillary glucose levels were 4.8±0.7 mmol/L in the intervention group and 4.9±0.8 mmol/L in the control group (P=.048), and preoperative intravenous fluid hydration was commenced in 49 of 252 patients (19.4%) in the intervention group and 76 of 252 patients (30.2%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.88; P=.005). In the operating theater, ketone was detected in the catheterized urine in 38 of 252 patients (15.1%) in the intervention group and 78 of 252 patients (31.0%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.59; P<.001), and the numbers of doses of vasopressors needed to correct hypotension were 2.3±1.7 in the intervention group and 2.7±2.2 in the control (P=.009). The recommendation rates for preoperative oral intake regimen to a friend were 95.2% (240/252) in the intervention group and 39.7% (100/252) in the control group (relative risk, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 2.06–2.80; P<.001), in favor of free access to water. Other assessed maternal and neonatal outcomes were not different.

Conclusion

Compared with fasting, free access to water in planned cesarean delivery reduced perioperative vomiting and was strongly favored by women. In addition, several pre- and intraoperative secondary outcomes were improved. However, postcesarean delivery recovery and neonatal outcomes were not different.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Video


(13.85 Mo)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : cesarean, oral intake, preoperative, satisfaction, spinal anesthesia, vomiting


Plan


 This study was conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This research was internally funded by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
 This trial was approved by the University of Malaya Medical Centre Medical Research Ethics Committee on September 28, 2020 (reference number: 2020623-8813).
 This study is registered in the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry on October 1, 2020 (registration number: ISRCTN63282932; ISRCTN63282932). The first participant was recruited on October 2, 2020.
 Individual participant data will be available, particularly individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). Another document that will be available is the trial protocol. Data will be available beginning 3 months and ending 5 years after article publication to investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for the purpose of individual participant data meta-analysis only. Proposals should be directed to P.C.T. (pctan@um.edu.my).
 Cite this article as: Ng YL, Segaran S, Yim CCW, et al. Preoperative free access to water compared to fasting for planned cesarean under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;XX:x.ex–x.ex.


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.