S'abonner

Disparities in COVID-19 mortality amongst the immunosuppressed: A systematic review and meta-analysis for enhanced disease surveillance - 15/03/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.01.009 
Meredith Leston a, , Willam Elson a, Jose M. Ordóñez-Mena a, Debasish Kar a, Heather Whitaker b, Mark Joy a, Nia Roberts c, F.D. Richard Hobbs a, Simon de Lusignan a
a Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom 
b Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, United Kingdom 
c Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Old Campus Road, Old Campus Research Building, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Summary

Background

Effective disease surveillance, including that for COVID-19, is compromised without a standardised method for categorising the immunosuppressed as a clinical risk group.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether excess COVID-associated mortality compared to the immunocompetent could meaningfully subdivide the immunosuppressed. Our study adhered to UK Immunisation against infectious disease (Green Book) criteria for defining and categorising immunosuppression. Using OVID (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Transplant Library, and Global Health), PubMed, and Google Scholar, we examined relevant literature between the entirety of 2020 and 2022. We selected for cohort studies that provided mortality data for immunosuppressed subgroups and immunocompetent comparators. Meta-analyses, grey literature and any original works that failed to provide comparator data or reported all-cause or paediatric outcomes were excluded.

Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of COVID-19 mortality were meta-analysed by immunosuppressed category and subcategory. Subgroup analyses differentiated estimates by effect measure, country income, study setting, level of adjustment, use of matching and publication year. Study screening, extraction and bias assessment were performed blinded and independently by two researchers; conflicts were resolved with the oversight of a third researcher. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022360755.

Findings

We identified 99 unique studies, incorporating data from 1,542,097 and 56,248,181 unique immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients with COVID-19 infection, respectively. Compared to immunocompetent people (pooled OR, 95%CI), solid organ transplants (2.12, 1.50-2.99) and malignancy (2.02, 1.69-2.42) patients had a very high risk of COVID-19 mortality. Patients with rheumatological conditions (1.28, 1.13-1.45) and HIV (1.20, 1.05-1.36) had just slightly higher risks than the immunocompetent baseline. Case type, setting income and mortality data matching and adjustment were significant modifiers of excess immunosuppressed mortality for some immunosuppressed subgroups.

Interpretation

Excess COVID-associated mortality among the immunosuppressed compared to the immunocompetent was seen to vary significantly across subgroups. This novel means of subdivision has prospective benefit for targeting patient triage, shielding and vaccination policies during periods of high disease transmission.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

There is no universally accepted means of defining or subdividing the immunosuppressed.
We investigated if excess COVID mortality could risk-stratify immunosuppression.
99 unique studies were reviewed and meta-analysed.
Mortality was highest in transplants/cancers, lowest in HIV/inflammatory conditions.
Case type, study setting & data matching and adjustment influenced risk gradients.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Immunocompromised, Disease surveillance, Digital health, Immunosuppressed, Covid, COVID-19, Vaccination, Vaccines, Personalised medicine, Pandemic preparedness


Plan


© 2024  The Author(s). Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 88 - N° 3

Article 106110- mars 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Cefiderocol either in monotherapy or combination versus best available therapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Lorenzo Onorato, Ilaria de Luca, Caterina Monari, Nicola Coppola
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The clinical outcome of COVID-19 is strongly associated with microbiome dynamics in the upper respiratory tract
  • Linlin Xie, Gengyan Luo, Zhongzhou Yang, Wei-chen Wu, Jintao Chen, Yuting Ren, Zhikun Zeng, Guangming Ye, Yunbao Pan, Wen-jing Zhao, Yao-qing Chen, Wei Hou, Yanni Sun, Deying Guo, Zifeng Yang, Jun Li, Edward C. Holmes, Yirong Li, Liangjun Chen, Mang Shi

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.