Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Testing Interventions to Reduce Physician Burnout - 24/02/24
, Jordan Tuia, BS, Sarah L. Miller, MAS, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPHAbstract |
Background |
Physicians deal with intense professional pressures, which may contribute to increasing burnout. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of interventions designed to reduce burnout in physicians, physicians-in-training, and other health care professionals.
Methods |
We searched PubMed and Embase (through January 6, 2023) and reference lists. We included all randomized studies assessing an intervention designed to reduce professional burnout in physicians and other health care personnel. We adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines. We abstracted data on study and participant characteristics, study outcomes, and study quality. We used a random-effects model to pool mean differences in burnout change (pre- and post-intervention) between intervention and control arms.
Results |
Thirty-one of the 38 eligible studies (81.6%) used the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) questionnaire to assess burnout. When comparing the intervention and control groups, the mean difference in the emotional exhaustion component of the MBI was −1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], −2.14 to −0.09; I2: 74.5%; 20 studies); the mean difference in the depersonalization component of the MBI was −0.32 (95% CI, −0.63 to −0.01; I2: 54.2%; 17 studies); and the mean difference in the personal accomplishment component of the MBI was 1.11 (95% CI, −0.21 to 2.43; I2: 94.3%; 16 studies).
Conclusions |
Studies testing interventions to decrease physician burnout led to significant numerical improvements in some domains of burnout, but it is unlikely that these changes result in meaningful changes in clinical burnout. Further, the limited follow-up time, biased assessments, and heterogeneity in intervention efficacy suggest that a more nuanced understanding of the causes of burnout is needed to develop more effective interventions.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Coaching, Physicians, Professional burnout
Plan
| Funding: The authors of the manuscript have received funding from Arnold Ventures. The funder had no role in the analysis or interpretation of the findings. |
|
| Conflicts of Interest: VP: Research funding—Arnold Ventures; Royalties—Johns Hopkins Press, Medscape, and MedPage; Honoraria—Grand Rounds/lectures from universities, medical centers, non-profits, and professional societies; Consulting—UnitedHealthcare and OptumRX; Other—Plenary Session podcast has Patreon backers, YouTube, and Substack. All other authors have no financial nor non-financial conflicts of interest to report. |
|
| Authorship: VP and AH conceptualized study design; AH, JT, and SLM reviewed and abstracted data; VP reviewed and confirmed abstracted data; AH wrote first draft of manuscript; and VP, SLM, and JT reviewed and revised subsequent and finalized draft of manuscript. |
Vol 137 - N° 3
P. 249 - mars 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
