Patient factors related to patient engagement technology (PET) usage in thoracic surgery - 22/02/24
Abstract |
Background |
We evaluated using Patient Engagement Technology (PET) to capture Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in thoracic surgery patients.
Methodsy |
atients using a PET received surveys including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10) and a health literacy (HL) screen. The relationship of patient-level factors with survey completion was assessed through univariate and logistic regression analyses.
Results |
703 patients enrolled in a PET. 52 % were female and 83 % were white with a median age of 63.72 % had adequate HL. 81 % completed the PROMIS-10 survey. Univariate analysis found lower rates of PROMIS-10 completion in male patients and those with inadequate HL. Logistic regression analysis showed adequate HL (OR 1.76) and white race (OR 1.72) were associated with PROMIS-10 survey completion, while male gender (OR 0.65) had the opposite effect.
Conclusions |
PETs are an effective means of collecting PROs, but use is affected by gender, race, and health literacy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | PROs are being incorporated as measures of health care quality. |
• | PETs may be a solution for collecting PROs. |
• | White patients and those with adequate HL are more likely to complete PRO surveys. |
• | Male patients were less likely to complete PRO surveys. |
Keywords : Patient reported outcomes, Patient engagement technology, Health literacy
Plan
Vol 228
P. 242-246 - février 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?