S'abonner

Biomechanical comparison of distal femoral fracture fixation: Polyaxial vs. uniaxial locking screws with different blocking screw configurations in retrograde femoral nailing - 26/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103695 
Suat Batar a, Mehmet Salih Söylemez a, , Süreyya Ergun Bozdağ b, Enis Yaman b, Bahattin Kemah a, Oğuz Sukru Poyanlı c
a Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Elmalıkent, Adem Yavuz Cd., 34764 Ümraniye/İstanbul, Turkey 
b Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey 
c Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Medeniyet University, Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Highlights

Multiaxial locking and/or parallel screws with a single laterally positioned blocking screw provide better stiffness and stability for the treatment of unstable dia-metaphyseal distal femoral fractures.
The performance of a laterally positioned single blocking screw is comparable to that of two blocking screws.
Two blocking screws in conjunction with two parallel screws did not yield superior results.
Multiaxial locking provides better results by preventing collapse at the fracture site.
Two parallel locking screws alone is not good option for fixation of distal dia-metaphyseal fractures of femur.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical studies have indicated reduced reliance on blocking screws with the introduction of polyaxial locking nails, yet the biomechanical superiority of polyaxial locking over blocking screws remains unverified, specifically for distal dia-metaphyseal femur fractures.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that the combination of multiaxial locking using three screws and parallel locking reinforced by two blocking screws would result in superior outcomes compared to utilizing only parallel locking with two screws and one blocking screw.

Materials and methods

Third-generation custom-made femur models representing AO/OTA 32 A1.2 dia-metaphyseal comminuted oblique fractures were divided into four groups (n=10/group). Group A employed distal fixation with three 4.5-mm polyaxial screws. Group B used two parallel locking screws and two blocking screws, Group C used two parallel locking screws and one blocking screw, and Group D used only two parallel screws. Specimens underwent axial and torsional load testing to assess fatigue strength, ultimate strength, axial stiffness (N/mm), torsional stiffness (N/mm/deg), axial load to failure (N), torsional load to failure (N/mm), coronal and sagittal angulations, and fracture site collapse.

Results

Group C exhibited statistically superior torsional stiffness compared to Groups B and D (p=0.039 and p=0.034, respectively). Axial load to failure was highest in Group B and lowest in Group D (p=0.032). Group C demonstrated the highest torsional strength, while Group B exhibited the lowest (p=0.006). Coronal displacement was greatest in Group B, while Group A showed the highest resistance (p=0.009). Group A demonstrated the greatest resistance to fracture site collapse, with the weakest specimens observed in Groups B and C (p=0.01).

Discussion

The performance of a single laterally positioned blocking screw is comparable to using two blocking screws. Medial positioning of a second blocking screw is unnecessary for stability enhancement. Multiaxial locking prevents fracture site collapse and coronal plane angulation more effectively than other methods. Multiaxial locking and/or parallel screws with a single laterally positioned blocking screw provide superior stiffness and stability for treating unstable dia-metaphyseal distal femoral fractures.

Level of evidence

N/A.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Distal femoral fracture, Retrograde intramedullary nail, Blocking screw, Polyaxial locking screw, Biomechanics


Plan


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 110 - N° 1

Article 103695- février 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Minimally invasive cerclage at the tibia using a modified Goetze technique: An anatomical study
  • Stefan Förch, Leonard Lisitano, Franziska von der Helm, Jan Reuter, Edgar Mayr
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Synergistic effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma combined with an extracorporeal shock wave in treatment of long diaphysis aseptic nonunion
  • Chaode Cen, Yongfei Cao, Yong Zhang, Chaoran Hu, Yusong Wang, Keming Xia, Chengwei Liu, Bing Qiu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.