S'abonner

Efficacy and safety of moxidectin compared with ivermectin against Strongyloides stercoralis infection in adults in Laos and Cambodia: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase 2b/3 trial - 25/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00507-8 
Viviane P Sprecher, MSc a, c, Daniela Hofmann, PhD a, Vanthanom Savathdy, MSc d, Phengsavanh Xayavong, MSc d, Chomseng Norkhankhame, MSc d, Rekol Huy, PhD e, Virak Khieu, PhD e, Somphou Sayasone, PhD d, Jan Hattendorf, PhD b, c, Jennifer Keiser, ProfPhD a, c,
a Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland 
b Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland 
c University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 
d Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Vientiane, Laos 
e National Centre for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 

* Correspondence to: Prof Jennifer Keiser, Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, CH-4123 Allschwil, Switzerland Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil CH-4123 Switzerland

Summary

Background

Infection with the soil-transmitted helminth Strongyloides stercoralis affects up to 600 million people globally, most of whom live in rural areas with poor sanitation. If untreated, infection leads to long-lasting morbidity and might even be life-threatening. Moxidectin might be a promising alternative to ivermectin, the only currently recommended single-dose treatment. We aimed to assess whether moxidectin is non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety compared with ivermectin.

Methods

In this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority, phase 2b/3 trial in communities in Laos and Cambodia, adults aged 18–65 years were screened for the presence of S stercoralis larvae in their stool via sextuplicate quantitative Baermann assays. Using computer-generated group allocation (block randomisation stratified by infection intensity), parasitologically (two or more positive Baermann assays) and clinically eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive single oral doses of either moxidectin (8 mg) and ivermectin-matched placebo, or ivermectin (200 μg/kg bodyweight) and moxidectin-matched placebo. The primary endpoint was cure rate assessed at 14–21 days after treatment, using the available-case population analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Moxidectin was considered non-inferior to ivermectin if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the difference was greater than the non-inferiority margin of –10 percentage points. Safety endpoints were assessed before treatment, and at 2–3 h, 24 h, and 14–21 days after treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04056325 and NCT04848688.

Findings

Between Dec 6, 2020, and May 21, 2022, 4291 participants were screened, 726 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to moxidectin (n=363) or ivermectin (n=363). For the participants with primary outcome data, we observed a cure rate of 93·6% (95% CI 90·5 to 96·0; 324 of 346 participants) in the moxidectin group and 95·7% (93·0 to 97·6; 335 of 350 participants) in the ivermectin group, resulting in a between-group difference of –2·1 percentage points (95% CI –5·5 to 1·3). The most common adverse events were abdominal pain (32 [9%] of 363 with moxidectin vs 34 [9%] of 363 with ivermectin) and headache (25 [7%] vs 30 [8%]), which were predominantly mild and transient.

Interpretation

Moxidectin was non-inferior to ivermectin in terms of efficacy in the treatment of strongyloidiasis. Additionally, both drugs had a similar safety profile. The fixed dose and lower cost of moxidectin compared with ivermectin make it a valuable alternative for people with strongyloidiasis.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2024  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 24 - N° 2

P. 196-205 - février 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Primaquine dose and the risk of haemolysis in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
  • Megha Rajasekhar, Julie A Simpson, Benedikt Ley, Peta Edler, Cindy S Chu, Tesfay Abreha, Ghulam R Awab, J Kevin Baird, Germana Bancone, Bridget E Barber, Matthew J Grigg, Jimee Hwang, Harin Karunajeewa, Marcus V G Lacerda, Simone Ladeia-Andrade, Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee, Komal R Rijal, Kavitha Saravu, Inge Sutanto, Walter R J Taylor, Kamala Thriemer, James A Watson, Philippe J Guerin, Nicholas J White, Ric N Price, Robert J Commons, WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) Vivax Primaquine Dosing Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety Study Group, Bipin Adhikari, Mohammad Shafiul Alam, Nicholas M Anstey, Ashenafi Assefa, Sarah C Boyd, Nguyen Hoang Chau, Nicholas PJ Day, Tamiru Shibiru Degaga, Arjen M Dondorp, Marcelo Urbano Ferreira, Prakash Ghimire, Justin A Green, Wasif Ali Khan, Gavin CKW Koh, Asrat Hailu Mekuria, Mohammad Nader Naadim, Erni J Nelwan, Francois Nosten, Ayodhia Pitaloka Pasaribu, David J Price, Kasia Stepniewska, Lorenz von Seidlein, Timothy William, Charles J Woodrow, Adugna Woyessa
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Boostability after single-visit pre-exposure prophylaxis with rabies vaccine: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
  • Lisanne A Overduin, Jan Pieter R Koopman, Corine Prins, Petra H Verbeek-Menken, Cornelis A De Pijper, Phaedra L Eblé, Fiona Heerink, Perry J J van Genderen, Martin P Grobusch, Leo G Visser

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.