S'abonner

Impact of emergency medicine clinical pharmacist practitioner-driven sepsis antibiotic interventions - 19/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.012 
Aubrie Hammond, PharmD , 1 , Regan Porter, PharmD, Kevin E. Lynch, PharmD, Taylor H. Cason, PharmD, Patrick Passaretti, PharmD
 CaroMont Regional Medical Center, 2525 Court Dr, Gastonia, NC 28054, United States of America 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend administration of antimicrobials within the first hour of recognition of sepsis. Over the last decade, several studies have demonstrated improved time-to-antibiotic administration and antibiotic appropriateness when a pharmacist was involved in the care of patients with sepsis. To our knowledge, no studies evaluating the appropriate use of antibiotics in sepsis driven entirely by an Emergency Medicine (EM) Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner (CPP) have been published. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of an EM CPP-driven protocol on antimicrobial interventions in patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

This was a retrospective comparison of patients with sepsis for whom antimicrobials were ordered in the ED without pharmacist intervention to patients whose antimicrobials were ordered by an EM CPP via a sepsis consult to pharmacy. An EM CPP reviewed individual patient profiles for pertinent historical admissions, culture data, and allergy profiles to guide antimicrobial selection for the suspected source of infection and entered orders under their scope of practice with formal documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). The primary objective of this study was to compare the rates of appropriate empiric antibiotic utilization in septic patients admitted from the ED pre- and post-protocol implementation. Secondary endpoints included the following, broadening of ED-initiated empiric antibiotics on hospital admission, time-to-antibiotic administration, in-hospital mortality, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) association with in-hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay.

Results

A total of 144 patients were included: 80 patients prescribed antibiotics without pharmacist intervention and 64 prescribed antibiotics by an EM CPP. Appropriate empiric antibiotic selection in the ED improved from 57.5% (46/80) to 86% (55/64) with EM CPP intervention (difference 28.5%; p < 0.01). Time-to-first antibiotic administration decreased by 64 min (p < 0.01). Administration of antibiotics within 60 min, broadening of antibiotics on admission, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ across groups.

Conclusions

In this small, single-center study, an EM Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner-driven protocol for patients with sepsis in the emergency department improved the rate of appropriate empiric antimicrobial selection and time-to-antibiotic administration.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Timely and appropriate antibiotic administration improves outcomes of septic patients.
A CPP-driven protocol improves the rate of appropriate empiric antimicrobials for sepsis in the ED.
A CPP-driven protocol improves time-to-antibiotic administration in the ED.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Antibiotics, Clinical pharmacist practitioner, Clinical pharmacy services, Emergency department, Emergency medicine clinical pharmacist, Sepsis

Abbreviations : ED, EMR, CMS, EM, CPP, ICD, IDSA, REMS, SSC


Plan


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 76

P. 24-28 - février 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Real-world comparison between mechanical and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Hyun Joon Kim, Dongwook Lee, Hyung Jun Moon, Dongkil Jeong, Tae Yong Shin, Sun In Hong, Hyun Jung Lee, The Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC) Investigators
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Inequities among patient placement in emergency department hallway treatment spaces
  • Kwame Tuffuor, Huifeng Su, Lesley Meng, Edieal Pinker, Asim Tarabar, Reinier Van Tonder, Chris Chmura, Vivek Parwani, Arjun K. Venkatesh, Rohit B. Sangal

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.