Assessing the external validity and clinical relevance of umbilical doppler resistance index references in daily practice - 13/01/24
Highlights |
• | This work suggests that reference centiles for umbilical artery resistance index (UARI) calculated from daily practice are close to current references based on prospective longitudinal studies specifically designed for this purpose. |
• | This study strengthens the external validity of current reference ranges for UARI and confirms their clinical relevance. |
Abstract |
Objective |
To assess the external validity and clinical relevance of current references for umbilical artery resistance index (UA RI) in daily practice.
Methods |
Retrospective cross-sectional single center study including all UA RI measurements between 22 and 40 gestational weeks (GW) from distinct patients between 2014 and 2022. Patients with normal pregnancies and normal neonatal outcomes that had an UA RI measurement between 2014 and 2019 were used to calculate reference ranges. The established reference for the 95th centile was compared to two current references. The clinical relevance of the established reference was tested by comparing neonatal outcomes according to the 95th percentile among the consecutive distinct patients between 2020 and 2022.
Results |
Among the 13342 consecutive distinct patients with a singleton pregnancy that had an UA RI measurement between 22 and 40 GW between 2014 and 2022, 5298 patients were included to establish the reference ranges, and 3634 patients to validate these ranges. For each gestational age, the established references were similar to current references. Using the established references, the proportion of patients presenting an UA RI>95th percentile among the patients with normal pregnancies in the validation population was comparable to the proportion when using the two current references. Among the validation population, 268 patients (7.4 %) (95%CI[6.5-8.2]) presented an UA RI ≥ 95th percentile. Of these 268 patients, 67.9% had a SGA newborn (versus 19.2%, p<0.001) and 59% a preterm birth (versus 13.9%, p<0.001).
Conclusions |
The reference range obtained from daily practice is clinically relevant and similar to current references.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Blood flow velocity / physiology*, Fetal development, Gestational age*, Humans, Pregnancy, Reference values, Ultrasonography
Plan
Vol 53 - N° 2
Article 102720- février 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?