S'abonner

Treatment-related adverse events, including fatal toxicities, in patients with solid tumours receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - 03/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00524-7 
Yu Fujiwara, MD a, b, Nobuyuki Horita, MD PhD c, Elio Adib, MD d, Susu Zhou, MD a, Amin H Nassar, MD e, Zain UL Abideen Asad, MD MS f, Alessio Cortellini, MD PhD g, h, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, MD i,
a Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA 
b Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA 
c Chemotherapy Center, Yokohama City University Hospital, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan 
d Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 
e Department of Hematology/Oncology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA 
f Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA 
g Operative Research Unit of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy 
h Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK 
i Medical Oncology/TSET Phase 1 Program, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA 

* Correspondence to: Dr Abdul Rafeh Naqash, Medical Oncology/TSET Phase 1 Program, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA Medical Oncology/TSET Phase 1 Program Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City OK 73104 USA

Summary

Background

Incorporating immune checkpoint blockade into perioperative cancer therapy has improved clinical outcomes. However, the safety of immune checkpoint blockade needs better evaluation, given the chances of more prolonged disease-free survival. We aimed to assess how adding immune checkpoint blockade to perioperative therapy affects treatment-related adverse events.

Methods

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from database inception until Aug 8, 2023, for randomised controlled trials that assessed the addition of immune checkpoint blockade to neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for cancer, reported treatment-related deaths, and had a design in which the experimental group assessed immune checkpoint blockade in combination with the therapy used in the control group. Meta-analysis was done to pool odds ratios (ORs) of treatment-related deaths, any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022343741.

Findings

28 randomised controlled trials with 16 976 patients were included. The addition of immune checkpoint blockade was not significantly associated with increased treatment-related deaths (OR 1·76, 95% CI 0·95–3·25; p=0·073), consistent across immune checkpoint blockade subtype (I2=0%). 40 fatal toxicities were identified across 9864 patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade, with pneumonitis being the most common (six [15·0%]); 13 fatal toxicities occurred among 7112 patients who were not treated with immune checkpoint blockade. The addition of immune checkpoint blockade increased the incidence of grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (OR 2·73, 95% CI 1·98–3·76; p<0·0001), adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (3·67, 2·45–5·51; p<0·0001), and treatment-related adverse events of any grade (2·60 [1·88–3·61], p<0·0001). The immune checkpoint blockade versus placebo design primarily used as adjuvant therapy was associated with increased incidence of treatment-related deaths (4·02, 1·04–15·63; p=0·044) and grade 3–4 adverse events (5·31, 3·08–9·15; p<0·0001), whereas the addition of immune checkpoint blockade in the neoadjuvant setting was not associated with increased incidence of treatment-related death (1·11, 95% CI 0·38–3·29; p=0·84) or grade 3–4 adverse events (1·17, 0·90–1·51; p=0·23).

Interpretation

The addition of immune checkpoint blockade to perioperative therapy was associated with an increase in grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. These findings provide safety insights for further clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant or adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Clinicians should closely monitor patients for treatment-related adverse events to prevent treatment discontinuations and morbidity from these therapies in earlier-stage settings.

Funding

None.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2024  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 25 - N° 1

P. 62-75 - janvier 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Atezolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor130): final overall survival analysis from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study
  • Aristotelis Bamias, Ian D Davis, Matthew D Galsky, José Á Arranz, Eiji Kikuchi, Enrique Grande, Xavier Garcia del Muro, Se Hoon Park, Ugo De Giorgi, Boris Alekseev, Marina Mencinger, Kouji Izumi, Fabio A Schutz, Javier Puente, Jian-Ri Li, Stefano Panni, Mahmut Gumus, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Sanjeev Mariathasan, Yekaterina Poloz, Fabiola Bene-Tchaleu, Chooi Lee, Sandrine Bernhard, Maria De Santis
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus camrelizumab for locally advanced cervical cancer (NACI study): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial
  • Kezhen Li, Jing Chen, Yingjie Hu, Yan-Zhou Wang, Yuanming Shen, Gang Chen, Wenju Peng, Zixuan Fang, Bairong Xia, Xiaojun Chen, Kun Song, Yingmei Wang, Dongling Zou, Yan-Chun Wang, Yingyan Han, Xue Feng, Jing Yuan, Shuaiqingying Guo, Xiaolin Meng, Chenzhao Feng, Yin Chen, Jie Yang, Junpeng Fan, Jianliu Wang, Jihui Ai, Ding Ma, Chaoyang Sun

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.