Association between institutional volume of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases and short term outcomes - 28/11/23
, Hideto Yasuda, MD, PhD a, b, Nobuya Kitamura, MD, PhD c , Tomohisa Nomura, MD, PhD d , Takashi Tagami, MD, MPH, PhD e , Hideo Yasunaga, MD, PhD f , Shotaro Aso, MD, MPH, PhD g , Munekazu Takeda, MD, PHD h , Takashi Moriya, MD, PhD a on behalf of the SOS-KANTO 2017 Study Group1
Abstract |
Background |
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a serious condition. The volume-outcome relationship and various post–cardiac arrest care elements are believed to be associated with improved neurological outcomes. Although previous studies have investigated the volume–outcome relationship, adjusting for post-cardiac arrest care, intra-class correlation for each institution, and other covariates may have been insufficient.
Objective |
To investigate the volume-outcome relationships and favorable neurological outcomes among OHCA cases in each institution.
Methods |
We conducted a prospective observational study of adult patients with non-traumatic OHCA using the OHCA registry in Japan. The primary outcome was 30-day favorable neurological outcomes, and the secondary outcome was 30-day survival. We set the cutoff values to trisect the number of patients as equally as possible and classified institutions into high-, middle-, and low-volume. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were performed to adjust for covariates and within-hospital clustering.
Results |
Among the 9909 registry patients, 7857 were included. These patients were transported to either low- (2679), middle- (2657), or high- (2521) volume institutions. The median number of eligible patients per institution in 19 months of study periods was 82 (range, 1–207), 252 (range, 210–353), and 463 (range, 390–701), respectively. After multivariable GEE using the low-volume institution as a reference, no significant difference in odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were noted for 30-day favorable neurological outcomes for middle volume [1.22 (0.69–2.17)] and high volume [0.80 (0.47–1.37)] institutions. Moreover, there was no significant difference for 30-day survival for middle volume [1.02 (0.51–2.02)] and high volume [1.09 (0.53–2.23)] institutions.
Conclusion |
The patient volume of each institution was not associated with 30-day favorable neurological outcomes. Although this result needs to be evaluated more comprehensively, there may be no need to set strict requirements for the type of institution when selecting a destination for OHCA cases.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | We report the volume–outcome relationships and neurological outcome in OHCA cases. |
• | We adjusted intra-class correlation and post-hospital arrival covariates in GEE. |
• | There was no association between OHCA cases and favorable neurological outcomes. |
• | There was no association between OHCA cases and survival. |
• | We could decide where to transport regardless of the volume of the institution. |
Keywords : Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Emergency medical services, Hospitals, high-volume, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Patient outcome assessment
Abbreviations : CAG, CI, CPC, CPR, EMS, GCS, GEE, IABP, ILCOR, OHCA, OR, PEA, ROSC, SD, TTM, V-A ECMO, VF, VT
Plan
Vol 75
P. 65-71 - janvier 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Is the shock index correlated with blood loss? An experimental study on a controlled hemorrhagic shock model in piglets
- Thomas Sanchez, Fabien Coisy, Laura Grau-Mercier, Céline Occelli, Florian Ajavon, Pierre-Géraud Claret, Thibaut Markarian, Xavier Bobbia
- Performance of Google bard and ChatGPT in mass casualty incidents triage
- Rick Kye Gan, Jude Chukwuebuka Ogbodo, Yong Zheng Wee, Ann Zee Gan, Pedro Arcos González
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?