S'abonner

HEART-score can be simplified without loss of discriminatory power in patients with chest pain – Introducing the HET-score - 20/11/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.037 
Henrik Löfmark, M.D a, , Josephine Muhrbeck, Ph.D a, Kai M. Eggers, Ph.D b, Rickard Linder, Ph.D a, Lina Ljung, Ph.D c, Arne Martinsson, Ph.D d, Dina Melki, Ph.D e, Nondita Sarkar, Ph.D f, Per Svensson, Ph.D c, Bertil Lindahl, Ph.D b, Tomas Jernberg, Ph.D a
a Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 
b Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 
c Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 
d Capio St Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 
e Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 
f Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 

Corresponding author at: Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Department of Cardiology, Danderyds University Hospital, Stockholm 182 88, Sweden.Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Department of CardiologyDanderyds University HospitalStockholm182 88Sweden

Abstract

Background

The History, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Age, Risk factors and Troponin, (HEART) score is useful for early risk stratification in chest pain patients. The aim was to validate previous findings that a simplified score using history, ECG and troponin (HET-score) has similar ability to stratify risk.

Methods

Patients presenting with chest pain with duration of ≥10 min and an onset of last episode ≤12 h but without ST-segment elevation on ECG at 6 emergency departments were eligible for inclusion. The HEART-score and the simplified HET-score were calculated. The endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI) as index diagnosis, readmission due to new MI or death within 30 days.

Results

HEART-score identified 32% as low risk (0-2p), 47% as intermediate risk (3-5p), and 20% as high risk (6-10p) patients. The endpoint occurred in 0.5%, 7.3% and 35.7%, respectively. HET-score identified 39%, 42% and 19% as low- (0p), intermediate- (1-2p) and high-risk (3-6p) patients, with the endpoint occurring in 0.6%, 6.2% and 43.2%, respectively.

When all variables included in the HEART-score were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, only History (OR, CI [95%]): 2.97(2.16–4.09), ECG (1.61[1.14–2.28]) and troponin level (5.21[3.91–6.95]) were significantly associated with cardiovascular events. When HEART- and HET-score were compared in a ROC-analysis, HET-score had a significantly larger AUC (0.887 vs 0.853, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared with HEART-score, HET-score is simpler and appears to have similar ability to discriminate between chest pain patients with and without cardiovascular event.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

HET-score had a similar ability as HEART score in predicting prognosis in the ED
Both among those without and with elevated troponin at presentation, HET-score had a similar ability as HEART-score to stratify individuals risk
The score variable reflecting the troponin level had the strongest association with the risk of cardiovascular event
Age and risk factors were significantly associated with a lower risk of events

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Chest pain, Acute coronary syndrome, Score, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Abbreviations : Emergency Departments, acute coronary syndrome, electrocardiogram, left bundle branch block, high-sensitive Troponin, limit of detection, receiver operating curves, area under the curve, myocardial infarction, odds ratio, confidence interval


Plan


© 2023  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 74

P. 104-111 - décembre 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Sex differences in acute ischemic stroke presentation are a matter of infarct location
  • Hannah M. Higgins, Lucia Chen, Brandy C. Ravare, Kerri A. Jeppson, Heather T. Bina, Paco S. Herson, Andrew A. Monte, Sharon N. Poisson, Layne Dylla
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Measurement of level of consciousness by AVPU scale assessment system based on automated video and speech recognition technology
  • Dong Hyun Choi, Ki Jeong Hong, Sang Do Shin, Sungwan Kim, Minhwa Chung, Ki Hong Kim, Kyoung Jun Song, Minwoo Cho, Dan Yoon, Jooyoung Lee

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.