Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has emerged as a promising tool for detecting and profiling longitudinal genomics changes in cancer. While copy-number alterations (CNAs) play a major role in cancers, treatment effect monitoring using copy-number profiles has received limited attention as compared to mutations. A major reason for this is the insensitivity of CNA analysis for the real-life tumor-fraction ctDNA samples. We performed copy-number analysis on 152 plasma samples obtained from 29 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) using a sequencing panel targeting over 500 genes. Twenty-one patients had temporally matched tissue and plasma sample pairs, which enabled assessing concordance with tissues sequenced with the same panel or whole-genome sequencing and to evaluate sensitivity. Our approach could detect concordant CNA profiles in most plasma samples with as low as 5% tumor content and highly amplified regions in samples with ∼1% of tumor content. Longitudinal profiles showed changes in the CNA profiles in seven out of 11 patients with high tumor-content plasma samples at relapse. These changes included focal acquired or lost copy-numbers, even though most of the genome remained stable. Two patients displayed major copy-number profile changes during therapy. Our analysis revealed ctDNA-detectable subclonal selection resulting from both surgical operations and chemotherapy. Overall, longitudinal ctDNA data showed acquired and diminished CNAs at relapse when compared to pre-treatment samples. These results highlight the importance of genomic profiling during treatment as well as underline the usability of ctDNA.