S'abonner

Are self-reported anthropometric data reliable enough to meet antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in orthopedic surgery? - 01/11/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103627 
Michael Butnaru a, , Matthieu Lalevée b, Pierre-Alban Bouché c, Thomas Aubert a, Antoine Mouton a, Blandine Marion a, Simon Marmor a
a Hôpital Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 125, rue d’Avron, 75020 Paris, France 
b Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France 
c Hôpital Lariboisière, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection is a serious complication in orthopedic surgery. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) combined with other prevention strategies has been shown to reduce this risk to 1% for hip arthroplasty and 2% for knee arthroplasty. The French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) recommends doubling the dose when the patient's weight is greater than or equal to 100 kg, and the body mass index (BMI) is greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2. Similarly, patients with a BMIgreater than40 kg/m2 orlesser than18 kg/m2 are ineligible for surgery in our hospital. Self-reported anthropometric measurements are commonly used in clinical practice to calculate BMI, but their validity has not been assessed in the orthopedic literature. Therefore, we conducted a study comparing self-reported with systematically measured values and observed the impact these differences may have on perioperative AP regimens and contra-indications to surgery.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis of our study was that self-reported anthropometric values differed from those measured during preoperative orthopedic consultations.

Materials and methods

This single-center retrospective study with prospective data collection was conducted between October and November 2018. The patient-reported anthropometric data were first collected and then directly measured by an orthopedic nurse. Weight was measured with a precision of 500 g and height was measured with a precision of 1 cm.

Results

A total of 370 patients (259 women and 111 men) with a median age of 67 years (17–90) were enrolled. The data analysis found significant differences between the self-reported and measured height [166 cm (147–191) vs. 164 cm (141–191) (p<0.0001)], weight [72.9 kg (38–149) vs. 73.1 kg (36–140) (p<0.0005)] and BMI [26.3 (16.2–46.4) vs. 27 (16–48.2) (p<0.0001)]. Of these patients, 119 (32%) reported an accurate height, 137 (37%) an accurate weight, and 54 (15%) an accurate BMI. None of the patients had two accurate measurements. The maximum underestimation was 18 kg for weight, 9 cm for height, and 6.15 kg/m2 for BMI. The maximum overestimation was 28 kg for weight, 10 cm for height, and 7.2 kg/m2 for BMI. The verification of the anthropometric measurements identified another 17 patients who had contra-indications to surgery (12 with a BMI>40 kg/m2 and 5 with a BMI<18 kg/m2) and who would not have been detected based on the self-reported values.

Conclusions

Although patients underestimated their weight and overestimated their height in our study, these had no impact on the perioperative AP regimens. However, this misreporting failed to detect potential contraindications to surgery.

Level of evidence

IV; retrospective study with prospective data collection and no control group.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Arthroplasty, Body mass index, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Arthritis, Infectious etiology, Obesity, Complications


Plan


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 109 - N° 7

Article 103627- novembre 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • How to avoid systematic postoperative blood test after total hip arthroplasty: A new risk scoring system compared to Wu's score
  • Gautier Beckers, Julie Manon, Gauthier Lejeune, Maximilian Gläser, Ludovic Kaminski, Olivier Cornu, Maité Van Cauter
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty by direct minimally invasive anterolateral approach: A controlled study
  • Matthieu Lalevée, Lucas Martinez, Benjamin Rey, Julien Beldame, Jean Matsoukis, Thomas Poirier, Helena Brunel, Stéphane Van Driessche, Nathalie Noé, Fabien Billuart

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.