S'abonner

What to improve: Results of fixed-hinge knee endoprosthesis reconstructions over 40 years in a single tumor center - 01/11/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103682 
Baptiste Boukebous a, b, , Valérie Dumaine c, Victoire Cladière-Nassif c, Philippe Anract a, c, David Biau a, c
a Inserm, équipe ECAMO, CRESS (Centre of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS), UMR 1153, université Paris-Cité, 1, Parvis Notre-Dame – place Jean-Paul II, 75004 Paris, France 
b Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Beaujon/Bichat, université Paris-Cité, AP–HP, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France 
c Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Cochin, université Paris-Cité, AP–HP, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 74014 Paris, France 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Introduction

Over the past decades, numerous structural changes in implants, medical treatments, and surgical techniques have been made for Malignant Bone Tumors (MBT) around the knee. However, the overall care improvement is still unclear. The method is crucial when analyzing outcomes in surveys involving tumors, and a thorough assessment of the mortality is mandatory because death acts as competing event. The aims of this study were: 1) a comprehensive and longitudinal assessment of the revisions with an extensive follow-up and adequate methods; 2) a complete mortality review to consider competing risks.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis was that some prosthesis's structural improvements were made while the surgical toll increased as well as an improvement of mortality was also expected.

Material and methods

Analyses were performed on 248 patients with MBT (mean follow-up was 8.7 years, surgeries between 1972 and 2017). Three prosthesis models were successively used over time: 120 Guepar (older model), 42 Tornier, and 86 Stanmore (more recent model). The primary outcome was the assessment of revisions sorted out according to Henderson: type-1 soft-tissue failures or instability, type-2 aseptic loosening, type-3 structural failures, type-4 periprosthetic infections, type-5 tumoral progression. Death and amputations were considered as competing events. An extensive assessment of mortality was performed by merging the dataset with the French register of Deaths (INSEE). Cumulative probabilities were computed at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years and compared with Gray's tests.

Results

The overall 5-year survival was, 80% (95% CI: 73–87) for Guepar, 69% (95% CI: 56–84) for Tornier, and 71% (95% CI: 62–82) for Stanmore (p=0.4). The 5-year cumulative risks for type-1 were 5% (95% CI: 1–9), 9% (95% CI: 0–18), and 17% (95% CI: 9–25) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.01). The 15-year cumulative risks for type-2 were 22% (95% CI: 15–39), 8% (95% CI: 0–17) and 8% (95% CI: 2–14) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.10). Ten patients had an implant failure, nine Guepar, and one Tornier. The 5-year cumulative risks for type-4 were 7% (95% CI: 2–12), 19% (95% CI: 7–31), and 12% (95% CI: 5–18) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). There were 29 tumoral progressions; the 15-year risks were 16% (95% CI: 2–22), 2% (95% CI: 0–7%), and 12% (95% CI: 4–19%) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). No difference whatsoever was found between the proximal tibial and distal femur.

Conclusion

There were some improvements in prosthesis design (forged steel instead of cast steel) and probably also in cemented stem fixation, but not in prosthetic joint infection and local recurrence over forty years. The overall mortality did not change significantly over the last 40 years amongst this specific cohort of patients who benefited from a hinge reconstruction prosthesis.

Level of evidence

III; comparative case series with sensibility analysis.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Hinged knee prosthesis, Reconstruction, Distal femur, Proximal tibia, Complications, Tumor


Plan


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 109 - N° 7

Article 103682- novembre 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Diagnosis and management of METS-Stanmore Morse taper failure
  • Grégoire Rougereau, François Gouin, Jean-Camille Mattei, Sébastien Raux, Alexandre Hardy, David Biau

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.