Endoscopic resection for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China - 11/08/23
Highlights |
• | Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ER for non-gastric GISTs. |
• | We retrospectively assessed 27 patients with non-gastric GISTs from January 2010 to December 2022. |
• | Finally, we draw conclusions that ER was an effective and safe method for non-gastric GISTs in selected cases, and GISTs of a small size and regular shape with an intraluminal growth pattern should be considered to ensure complete resection. |
Abstract |
Background and aims |
Few studies on endoscopic resection (ER) for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) have been conducted, and most have been case reports or case series. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ER for non-gastric GISTs.
Methods |
From January 2010 to December 2022, 329 patients who were diagnosed with GISTs underwent ER. After excluding 302 patients with gastric GISTs, we retrospectively assessed the data of 27 patients with non-gastric GISTs. The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, residual disease, recurrence, and complications.
Results |
A total of 15(55.6%) females and 12(44.4%) males with a mean age of 53.8 ± 11.0 years were assessed. There were 19 (70.4%) GISTs in the esophagus, 2 (7.4%) in the duodenum, 3 (11.1%) in the colon and 3 (11.1%) in the rectum. The median tumor size was 12.0 mm (range 4.0–35.0 mm). Most of the GISTs (20, 74.1%) were very low risk, and the remaining 7(25.9%) were low risk. Both en bloc resection and complete resection were achieved in 25(92.6%) patients. Piecemeal resection mainly resulted from a larger tumor size, an irregular shape, and an extraluminal growth pattern. No residual disease or recurrence was noted during the follow-up period. The median operation time was 23 min (range 2–125 min). After excluding the operation time of EER, the operation time was prolonged to 37 min (range 12–125 min). Only one patient experienced mild abdominal pain, leading to a complication rate of 3.7%. No severe complications requiring for surgical interventions occurred.
Conclusion |
ER was an effective and safe method for non-gastric GISTs in selected cases. GISTs of a small size and regular shape with an intraluminal growth pattern require complete resection.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Endoscopic resection, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, Non-gastric
Abbreviations : Endoscopic resection, non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Plan
Enqiang Linghu will handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. |
Vol 47 - N° 7
Article 102152- août 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?