S'abonner

Impact of Universal Screening and Automated Clinical Decision Support for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Emergency Departments: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis - 19/07/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.033 
Margaret Lowenstein, MD, MPhil a, d, , Jeanmarie Perrone, MD b, d, Rachel McFadden, RN b, d, Ruiying Aria Xiong, MS a, e, Zachary F. Meisel, MD, MPH b, Nicole O’Donnell, CRS b, d, Dina Abdel-Rahman, BA b, e, Jeffrey Moon, MD, MPH b, Nandita Mitra, PhD c, Mucio Kit Delgado, MD, MS b, e
a Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 
c Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 
d Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 
e Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

Emergency department (ED)–initiated buprenorphine improves outcomes in patients with opioid use disorder; however, adoption varies widely. To reduce variability, we implemented a nurse-driven triage screening question in the electronic health record to identify patients with opioid use disorder, followed by targeted electronic health record prompts to measure withdrawal and guide next steps in management, including initiation of treatment. Our objective was to assess the impact of screening implementation in 3 urban, academic EDs.

Methods

We conducted a quasiexperimental study of opioid use disorder–related ED visits using electronic health record data from January 2020 to June 2022. The triage protocol was implemented in 3 EDs between March and July 2021, and 2 other EDs in the health system served as controls. We evaluated changes in treatment measures over time and used a difference-in-differences analysis to compare outcomes in the 3 intervention EDs with those in the 2 controls.

Results

There were 2,462 visits in the intervention hospitals (1,258 in the preperiod and 1,204 in the postperiod) and 731 in the control hospitals (459 in the preperiod and 272 in the postperiod). Patient characteristics within the intervention and control EDs were similar across the time periods. Compared with the control hospitals, the triage protocol was associated with a 17% greater increase in withdrawal assessment, using the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) (95% CI 7 to 27). Buprenorphine prescriptions at discharge also increased by 5% (95% CI 0% to 10%), and naloxone prescriptions increased by 12% points (95% CI 1% to 22%) in the intervention EDs relative to controls.

Conclusion

An ED triage screening and treatment protocol led to increased assessment and treatment of opioid use disorder. Protocols designed to make screening and treatment the default practice have promise in increasing the implementation of evidence-based treatment ED opioid use disorder care.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 132 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Donald M. Yealy, MD. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: ML and MKD were responsible for study concept and design, acquired the data, drafted the manuscript, and acquired funding. ML, RAX, NM, and MKD analyzed and interpreted the data. JP, RM, NO, ZFM, DAR, and JM participated in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. RAX and NM offered statistical expertise. ML takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria:(1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals’ policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This work was supported by the Penn Injury Science Center (CDC 19R49CE003083). Dr. Lowenstein was also supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant K23DA055087), and Dr. Delgado was also supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant K23HD090272001) and by a philanthropic grant from the Abramson Family Foundation.
 This work was presented as an oral abstract at the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting in New Orleans, LA, on May 12, 2022 and as a poster at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting in Orlando, FL, on April 7, 2022.
 Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide P7TH8YP to Annals on this particular article.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2023  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 82 - N° 2

P. 131-144 - août 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Cannabis Use Patterns and Whole-Blood Cannabinoid Profiles of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome
  • Rachel S. Wightman, Jane Metrik, Timmy R. Lin, Yu Li, Adina Badea, Robert Almeida, Alexandra B. Collins, Francesca L. Beaudoin
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Effect of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning on Epilepsy Development: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
  • Yu-Hsiang Meng, Ming-Shun Hsieh, Yu-Chi Chi, Chorng-Kuang How, Pau-Chung Chen, Chia-Ming Chang

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.