Effects of mechanical stimulation on mastectomy scars within 2 months of surgery: A single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial - 12/07/23
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Highlights |
• | Mechanical stimulation improves post-mastectomy scar appearance. |
• | Mechanical stimulation improves arm function post-mastectomy. |
• | Mechanical stimulation improves functional well-being after mastectomy. |
• | The benefits of mechanical stimulation can last 3 months after treatment. |
Abstract |
Background |
One common complication after mastectomy is thickened scars at the surgical site that impair shoulder function. This study aimed to investigate the effects of mechanical stimulation on scar appearance, arm function, and quality of life of breast cancer survivors after mastectomy.
Methods |
This was a single-center, single-blinded (assessor), randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up. Women who had undergone mastectomy in the preceding 6 weeks for breast cancer were randomly allocated to an experimental group and a control group by permuted block randomization (block size=6). The experimental group received conventional treatment (mobilization and strengthening exercises) and mechanical stimulation applied to the mastectomy scar twice a week for 6 weeks (12 sessions). The control group received 12 sessions of conventional treatment only. Primary outcome measures included the Vancouver Scar scale (VSS) to assess scar quality. The secondary outcomes were spectrophotometry, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; shoulder range of motion; the Numeric Pain Rating scale; hand grip strength; and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Breast Cancer (FACT-B).
Results |
One hundred and eight participants were equally randomized to 2 groups. All follow-up assessments were completed in September 2018. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed a significant group × time interaction on the VSS (η² = 0.161, p < 0.001), DASH (η² = 0.060, p = 0.003), and FACT-B functional well-being scores (η² = 0.033, p = 0.034), indicating that the experimental group (n=54) showed greater improvement in these outcomes than the control group (n=54). Post-hoc analysis showed that the improvements in the VSS and DASH scores remained apparent at the 3-month follow-up. Other outcomes did not yield significant group × time interaction. No adverse effects were reported.
Conclusion |
The addition of mechanical stimulation to a conventional intervention program improved scar appearance, arm function, and functional well-being compared with conventional intervention alone.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Mechanical stimulation, Mastectomy scars, Upper limb function, Quality of life
Abbreviations : ANOVA, DASH, FACT-B, ICC, MDC, NPRS, QoL, ROM, VSS
Plan
| Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (reference number: NCT02702050). Funding: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University PhD studentship |
Vol 66 - N° 5
Article 101724- juin 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Effectiveness of exercise training on the dyspnoea of individuals with long COVID: A randomised controlled multicentre trial
- Christophe Romanet, Johan Wormser, Audrey Fels, Pauline Lucas, Camille Prudat, Emmanuelle Sacco, Cédric Bruel, Gaëtan Plantefève, Frédéric Pene, Gilles Chatellier, François Philippart
- Combined optokinetic stimulation and cueing-assisted reading therapy to treat hemispatial neglect: A randomized controlled crossover trial
- Lisa Kunkel genannt Bode, Andreas Sprenger, Christoph Helmchen, Björn Hauptmann, Thomas F. Münte, Björn Machner
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.