S'abonner

Failing categorization of severe COVID-19 ARDS into ventilatory subphenotypes studied via the clinical-histopathologic relationship - 11/06/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107283 
Riccardo Colombo a, , 2 , Maddalena Alessandra Wu b, 2, Davide Ottolina a, Tommaso Fossali a, Jonathan Montomoli c, Gianluca Lopez a, d, Emanuele Catena a, Manuela Nebuloni d, e
on behalf of the

Luigi Sacco Hospital COVID-19 ARDS Study Group1

  The Luigi Sacco Hospital COVID-19 ARDS Study Group members are listed in the Appendix.

a Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy 
b Division of Internal Medicine, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy 
c Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini 
d Pathology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy 
e Department of Biological Sciences, University of Milan, Italy 

Corresponding author. Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco "Luigi Sacco" Hospital – Polo Universitario, University of Milan, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive CareASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco "Luigi Sacco" Hospital – Polo UniversitarioUniversity of MilanVia G.B. Grassi 74Milan20157Italy

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Background

Categorization of severe COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) into subphenotypes does not consider the trajectories of respiratory mechanoelastic features and histopathologic patterns. This study aimed to assess the correlation between mechanoelastic ventilatory features and lung histopathologic findings in critically ill patients who died because of CARDS.

Methods

Mechanically ventilated patients with severe CARDS who had daily ventilatory data were considered. The histopathologic assessment was performed through full autopsy of deceased patients. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the median worst respiratory system compliance during ICU stay (CrsICU).

Results

Eighty-seven patients admitted to ICU had daily ventilatory data. Fifty-one (58.6%) died in ICU, 41 (80.4%) underwent full autopsy and were considered for the clinical-histopathological correlation analysis. Respiratory system compliance at ICU admission and its trajectory were not different in survivors and non-survivors. Median CrsICU in the deceased patients was 22.9 ml/cmH2O. An inverse correlation was found between the CrsICU and late-proliferative diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) (r = −0.381, p = 0.026). Late proliferative DAD was more extensive (p = 0.042), and the probability of stay in ICU was higher (p = 0.004) in the “low” compared to the “high” CrsICU group. Cluster analysis further endorsed these findings.

Conclusions

In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, worsening of the respiratory system compliance correlated pathologically with the transition from early damage to late fibroproliferative patterns in non-survivors of CARDS. Categorization of CARDS into ventilatory subphenotypes by mechanoelastic properties at ICU admission does not account for the complexity of the histopathologic features.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Respiratory system compliance at ICU admission is not different between survivors and non-survivors.
Prevailing fibroproliferation is associated to more time spent in ICU and low respiratory system compliance during ICU stay.
Histopathological patterns and lung mechanoelastic characteristics evolve during disease course in critically ill patients.
Timeless categorization into low and high Crs phenotypes does not account for the mechanoelastic ventilatory trajectories.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : List: COVID-19, ARDS, Respiratory system compliance, Mechanical ventilation, Histopathology, Critical care


Plan


© 2023  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 215

Article 107283- août 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Development of a diagnostic score using FeNO and symptoms to predict asthma
  • Benjamin Brunn, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Rudolf A. Jörres, Konrad Schultz, Antonius Schneider
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Letter to the editor in response to Hoskote “Corrected formula for rectangular area ratio (RAR), a parameter used to quantify airflow limitation on expiratory flow-volume curves” Respiratory Medicine 2022; 204: 107032
  • Janos Porszasz, Chu-Yi Wang, Carrie Ferguson, Shuyi Ma, Michele Girardi, William W. Stringer

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.