S'abonner

Persistence of immune responses after heterologous and homologous third COVID-19 vaccine dose schedules in the UK: eight-month analyses of the COV-BOOST trial - 06/06/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.04.012 
Xinxue Liu a, 1, , Alasdair P S Munro b, 1, Annie Wright d, 1, Shuo Feng a, Leila Janani d, Parvinder K Aley a, e, Gavin Babbage b, Jonathan Baker b, c, David Baxter f, Tanveer Bawa g, Marcin Bula h, Katrina Cathie b, c, Krishna Chatterjee i, Kate Dodd h, Yvanne Enever j, Lauren Fox k, Ehsaan Qureshi l, Anna L. Goodman g, m, Christopher A Green l, John Haughney n, Alexander Hicks k, Christine E Jones b, c, Nasir Kanji a, Agatha A. van der Klaauw o, Vincenzo Libri p, Martin J Llewelyn q, Rebecca Mansfield r, Mina Maallah s, Alastair C McGregor s, Angela M. Minassian a, t, Patrick Moore u, Mehmood Mughal f, Yama F Mujadidi e, Hanane Trari Belhadef e, Kyra Holliday v, Orod Osanlou w, Rostam Osanlou x, Daniel R Owens b, c, Mihaela Pacurar b, c, Adrian Palfreeman y, Daniel Pan y, z, Tommy Rampling p, Karen Regan a, Stephen Saich b, Dinesh Saralaya aa, Sunil Sharma q, Ray Sheridan ab, Matthew Stokes b, Emma C Thomson n, ac, Shirley Todd ab, Chris Twelves v, Robert C. Read b, c, Sue Charlton ad, Bassam Hallis ad, Mary Ramsay ae, Nick Andrews ae, Teresa Lambe a, Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam af, Victoria Cornelius d, 2, Matthew D Snape a, e, 2, Saul N Faust b, 2,

the COV-BOOST study group3

  COV-BOOST Study Group authorship – appendix.

a Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 
b NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK 
c Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 
d Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK 
e NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK 
f Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, UK 
g Department of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
h NIHR Liverpool Clinical Research Facility, Liverpool, UK 
i NIHR Cambridge Clinical Research Facility, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK 
j PHARMExcel, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK 
k Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK 
l NIHR/Wellcome Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK 
m MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK 
n Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK 
o Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 
p NIHR UCLH Clinical Research Facility and NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
q University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK 
r Dorset Research Hub, Bournemouth, UK 
s Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, London Northwest University Healthcare, London, UK 
t Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 
u The Adam Practice, Poole, UK 
v NIHR Leeds Clinical Research Facility, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 
w Public Health Wales, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor University, Bangor, UK 
x University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK 
y University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK 
z Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK 
aa Bradford Institute for Health Research and Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK 
ab Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK 
ac MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK 
ad UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, UK 
ae UK Health Security Agency, Colindale, London, UK 
af Lifespan and Population Health Unit, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, UK 

Correspondence to: Oxford Vaccine Group, Centre for Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, OX3 7LA, UK.Oxford Vaccine Group, Centre for Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill HospitalOX3 7LAUK⁎⁎Correspondence to: NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonSO16 6YDUK

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Summary

Background

COV-BOOST is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial of seven COVID-19 vaccines used as a third booster dose in June 2021. Monovalent messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines were subsequently widely used for the third and fourth-dose vaccination campaigns in high-income countries. Real-world vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infections following third doses declined during the Omicron wave. This report compares the immunogenicity and kinetics of responses to third doses of vaccines from day (D) 28 to D242 following third doses in seven study arms.

Methods

The trial initially included ten experimental vaccine arms (seven full-dose, three half-dose) delivered at three groups of six sites. Participants in each site group were randomised to three or four experimental vaccines, or MenACWY control. The trial was stratified such that half of participants had previously received two primary doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca; hereafter referred to as ChAd) and half had received two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNtech, hereafter referred to as BNT). The D242 follow-up was done in seven arms (five full-dose, two half-dose). The BNT vaccine was used as the reference as it was the most commonly deployed third-dose vaccine in clinical practice in high-income countries. The primary analysis was conducted using all randomised and baseline seronegative participants who were SARS-CoV-2 naïve during the study and who had not received a further COVID-19 vaccine for any reason since third dose randomisation.

Results

Among the 817 participants included in this report, the median age was 72 years (IQR: 55–78) with 50.7% being female. The decay rates of anti-spike IgG between vaccines are different among both populations who received initial doses of ChAd/ChAd and BNT/BNT. In the population that previously received ChAd/ChAd, mRNA vaccines had the highest titre at D242 following their vaccine dose although Ad26. COV2. S (Janssen; hereafter referred to as Ad26) showed slower decay. For people who received BNT/BNT as their initial doses, a slower decay was also seen in the Ad26 and ChAd arms. The anti-spike IgG became significantly higher in the Ad26 arm compared to the BNT arm as early as 3 months following vaccination. Similar decay rates were seen between BNT and half-BNT; the geometric mean ratios ranged from 0.76 to 0.94 at different time points. The difference in decay rates between vaccines was similar for wild-type live virus-neutralising antibodies and that seen for anti-spike IgG. For cellular responses, the persistence was similar between study arms.

Conclusions

Heterologous third doses with viral vector vaccines following two doses of mRNA achieve more durable humoral responses compared with three doses of mRNA vaccines. Lower doses of mRNA vaccines could be considered for future booster campaigns.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Humoral responses following booster doses of adenoviral vector vaccines decay slower than following booster doses of mRNA vaccines.
Lower doses of mRNA vaccines as boosters may be equally as effective.
Further investigation into heterologous vaccine schedules for COVID-19 is warranted.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccination, Immunisation, Immunogenicity, Antibodies, T-Cells, Boosters


Plan


© 2023  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 87 - N° 1

P. 18-26 - juillet 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Epidemiology and risk factors for febrile ureteral stent-associated urinary tract infections: A prospective observational cohort study
  • Benoit Bailly, Maxime Lecheneaut, Houssein Gbaguidi-Haore, Catherine Chirouze, François Kleinclauss, Kevin Bouiller
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Focussed Assessment with Sonography in acute Lassa Fever (FASLa): Development of a point-of-care protocol and description of common ultrasound findings
  • Cyril O. Erameh, Till Koch, Osahogie Isaac Edeawe, Lisa Oestereich, Till Omansen, Johannes Jochum, Donatus I. Adomeh, Odia Ikponmwonsa, Chris Aire, Meike Pahlmann, Danny A. Asogun, Ephraim Ogbaini-Emovon, Sylvanus A. Okogbenin, Stephan Günther, Michael Ramharter, Peter E. Akideno, Benno Kreuels

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.