Incorporating genetics in identifying peanut allergy risk and tailoring allergen immunotherapy: A perspective on the genetic findings from the LEAP trial - 05/04/23
Abstract |
Examining the genetics of peanut allergy (PA) in the context of clinical trial interventions and outcomes provides an opportunity to not only understand gene-environment interactions for PA risk but to also understand the benefit of allergen immunotherapy. A consistent theme in the genetics of food allergy is that in keeping with the dual allergen exposure hypothesis, barrier- and immune-related genes are most commonly implicated in food allergy and tolerance. With a focus on PA, we review how genetic risk factors across 3 genes (FLG, MALT1, and HLA-DQA1) have helped delineate distinct allergic characteristics and outcomes in the context of environmental interventions in the Learning Early about Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study and other clinical trials. We specifically consider and present a framework for genetic risk prediction for the development of PA and discuss how genetics, age, and oral consumption intertwine to predict PA outcome. Although there is some promise in this proposed framework, a better understanding of the mechanistic pathways by which PA develops and persists is needed to develop targeted therapeutics for established disease. Only by understanding the mechanisms by which PA develops, persists, and resolves can we identify adjuvants to oral immunotherapy to make older children and adults immunologically similar to their younger, more malleable counterparts and thus more likely to achieve long-term tolerance.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Peanut allergy, oral immunotherapy, genetics, atopic dermatitis, eczema, filaggrin, MALT1, HLA
Abbreviations used : AD, FLG, GWAS, IMPACT, LEAP, MALT1, OIT, OR, PA, POISED, SNV
Plan
This research was performed as a project of the Immune Tolerance Network, an international clinical research consortium headquartered at the Benaroya Research Institute and supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award no. UM1AI109565. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. |
|
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: H. T. Bahnson, reports contract work paid to his institution, the Benaroya Research Institute, from DBV Technologies, MYOR (www.myorcare.com/), King’s College London, and Stanford University, as well as additional salary support paid by King’s College London and Stanford University. G. Lack reports grants from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, Food Allergy and Research Education, the Medical Research Council and Asthma UK Centre, the UK Department of Health through the National Institute for Health Research, the National Peanut Board, and The Davis Foundation, during the conduct of the study; in addition, he reports being a shareholder in DBV Technologies and Mighty Mission Me and personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi-Genyzme, Regeneron, ALK-Abelló, and Lurie Children's Hospital outside the submitted work. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 151 - N° 4
P. 841-847 - avril 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?