S'abonner

Randomized Trial of Surfactant Therapy via Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Brief Tracheal Intubation in Neonates Born Preterm - 14/03/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.10.009 
Jacqueline A. Gallup, MD 1, 2, Sussan Mbi Ndakor, MD 1, 3, Chad Pezzano, RRT-NPS 1, 4, Joaquim M.B. Pinheiro, MD, MPH 1,
1 Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 
2 Faxton-St Luke’s Healthcare, Utica, NY 
3 UnityPoint Health, Waterloo, IA 
4 Cardiorespiratory Services Department, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 

Reprint requests: Joaquim M. B. Pinheiro, MD, MPH, Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical Center, MC-101, 47 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208Department of PediatricsAlbany Medical CenterMC-10147 New Scotland AveAlbanyNY12208

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the possible noninferiority of surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (LMA) vs endotracheal tube (ETT) in avoiding the requirement for mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Study design

This was a randomized controlled trial including infants born at 27 to 36 weeks of gestation, >800 g, diagnosed with RDS and receiving fraction of inspired oxygen 0.30-0.60 via noninvasive respiratory support. Infants were randomized to surfactant via LMA (with atropine premedication) or ETT (InSuRE approach with atropine and remifentanil premedication). Primary outcome was failure of surfactant treatment to prevent the need for mechanical ventilation.

Results

Patients were randomized, 51 to LMA and 42 to the ETT group. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, with birth weights ranging from 810 to 3560 g. Failure rate was 29% in the ETT group and 20% in the LMA group (P = .311). This difference was due to early failures (within 1 hour), with 12.5% in the ETT group and 2% in the LMA group (P = .044). Surfactant therapy via LMA was non-inferior to administration via ETT; failure risk difference −9.0% (CI –∞ to 5.7%). Efficacy in decreasing fraction of inspired oxygen, number of surfactant doses administered, time to wean off all respiratory support, rates of adverse events, and outcomes including pneumothorax and BPD diagnosis did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

Surfactant therapy via LMA was noninferior to administration via ETT and it decreased early failures, possibly by avoiding adverse effects of premedication, laryngoscopy, and intubation. These characteristics make LMA a desirable conduit for surfactant administration.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02164734.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : respiratory distress syndrome, premedication, remifentanil, infant, newborn, laryngeal mask, supraglottic airway devices

Abbreviations : BPD, CPAP, ETT, FiO2, InSuRE, LISA, LMA, MIST, NICU, NIPPV, RDS


Plan


 Initial implementation of this study was supported in part by a Neonatology fellowship educational grant from ONY, Inc. All the remaining funding was from the authors’ institution. ONY, Inc, had no input into the design, conduct, analysis, or presentation of the study results, nor in the writing or publishing of this manuscript, and they did not receive advance notification of the results. C.P. declares he is on the Speakers’ Bureau of Chiesi Farmaceutici. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 Portions of this study were presented as oral abstracts during the Pediatric Academic Societies' meeting, held virtually on May 1-5, 2020 from Philadelphia, PA, USA, and during the American Academy of Pediatrics Virtual National Conference & Exhibition, on October 2-5, 2020.


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 254

P. 17 - mars 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Changes in Patterns of Infection Associated with Pediatric Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience in Japan
  • Hiroyuki Takao, Kentaro Nishi, Takanori Funaki, Yuta Inoki, Kei Osaka, Taishi Nada, Shunsuke Yokota, Mai Sato, Masao Ogura, Kenji Ishikura, Akira Ishiguro, Koichi Kamei
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Delayed Surgical Closure of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus: Does the Brain Pay the Price?
  • Petra Lemmers, Daniel Vijlbrief, Manon Benders, Thomas Alderliesten, Moniek Veldhuis, Wim Baerts, Corine Koopman-Esseboom, Floris Groenendaal, Frank van Bel

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.