Catheter versus surgical approach for the management of concomitant aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: An inverse probability treatment weighting analysis - 11/03/23
Highlights |
• | Patients with concomitant AS and CAD can be treated by catheter or surgery. |
• | Patients treated by catheter have a higher co-morbidity burden. |
• | The surgical approach is associated with a higher rate of procedural complications. |
• | Patients treated by catheter have similar late outcomes to those treated by surgery. |
Summary |
Background |
Two therapeutic strategies are available when aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease coexist: a transcatheter approach, with percutaneous coronary intervention followed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement; and a surgical approach, consisting of surgical aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass graft.
Aim |
We sought to compare the outcomes of these two strategies.
Methods |
The study population consisted of 241 patients who benefited from aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularization (transcatheter, n=150; surgery, n=91).
Results |
Patients in the transcatheter population were older (83.5 vs. 71.8years; P<0.001) and had a higher Logistic EuroSCORE (11.1% vs. 5.7%; P<0.001). At 30days postprocedure, patients who had surgery exhibited more life-threatening bleedings (12.1% vs 4.5%; P=0.034), acute kidney injury (12.1% vs. 1.3%; P<0.001) and atrial fibrillation (55.6% vs. 8.7%; P<0.001). After a median follow-up of 27months, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events did not differ significantly between the two strategies (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97–2.04; P=0.07), whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate<60mL/min (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.58–3.12; P<0.001), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.37–2.91; P<0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction<50% (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.12–2.55; P=0.012) were associated with a negative prognosis.
Conclusions |
In our study, patients with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease treated by catheter were older and had a higher co-morbidity burden than those treated by surgery. The surgical strategy was associated with a higher rate of 30-day complications, but long-term outcomes were similar between the two strategies.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Aortic stenosis, Coronary artery disease, Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Surgical aortic valve replacement
Abbreviations : AS, CABG, CAD, CI, eGFR, HR, IPTW, LVEF, MACCE, PAD, PCI, SAVR, TAVR
Plan
☆ | Tweet: PCI+TAVR versus SAVR+CABG: higher rate of procedural complications associated with the surgical approach, but similar late outcomes. Twitter address: @LFX51. |
Vol 116 - N° 3
P. 117-125 - mars 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.