Effect of wearable exoskeleton on post-stroke gait: A systematic review and meta-analysis - 22/02/23
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
Highlights |
• | Exoskeleton-assisted and conventional gait training were compared (POWER-assisted gait training [PAGT] vs conventional gait training). |
• | PAGT was superior in improving walk speed and balance at the end of the training. |
• | PAGT was superior in improving overall mobility at the end of the follow-up. |
• | Whether wearing exoskeleton is beneficial during walking remains unknown. |
Abstract |
Background |
Wearable exoskeletons are a recently developed technology.
Objectives |
The present systematic review aimed to investigate the effect of a wearable exoskeleton on post-stroke walking by considering its use in a gait training system and simply as an orthosis assisting walking.
Methods |
We systematically searched for randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Embase databases from their earliest publication record to July 2021. We chose reports of trials investigating the effects of exoskeleton-assisted training or the effects of wearing an exoskeleton to assist walking. A meta-analysis was conducted to explore the benefits of the wearable exoskeleton on mobility capacity, walking speed, motor function, balance, endurance and activities of daily living.
Results |
We included 13 studies (492 participants) comparing exoskeleton-assisted training with dose-matched conventional gait training. Studies addressing the effect of wearing a wearable exoskeleton were unavailable. As compared with conventional gait training at the end of the intervention, exoskeleton-assisted training was superior for walking speed (mean difference [MD] 0.13 m/s, 95% CI 0.05; 0.21) and balance (standardized MD [SMD] 0.3, 95% CI 0.07; 0.54). The subgroup with chronic stroke (i.e., > 6 months) presented the outcome favouring exoskeleton-assisted training regarding overall mobility capacity (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.04; 0.69). At the end of follow-up, exoskeleton-assisted training was superior to conventional gait training in overall mobility (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.07; 0.84) and endurance (MD 46.23 m, 95% CI 9.90; 82.56).
Conclusions |
Exoskeleton-assisted training was superior to dose-matched conventional gait training in several gait-related outcomes at the end of the intervention and follow-up in this systematic review and meta-analysis, which may support the use of exoskeleton-assisted training in the rehabilitation setting. Whether wearing versus not wearing a wearable exoskeleton is beneficial during walking remains unknown.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Stroke rehabilitation, Mobility limitation, Exoskeleton device, Robotics, Wearable device
Abbreviation : ADL, CGT, FAC, MD, PAGT, POWER, SMD
Plan
Vol 66 - N° 1
Article 101674- février 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.