S'abonner

Descriptive analysis of emergency medical services 72-hour repeat patient encounters in a single, Urban Agency - 21/02/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.025 
Michael W. Supples, MD a, , Mark Liao, MD b, Daniel P. O'Donnell, MD b, Thomas J. Duszynski, PhD, MPH c, Nancy K. Glober, MD b
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, United States of America 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States of America 
c Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, United States of America 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency department unscheduled return visits within 72-h of discharge, called a “bounceback”, have been used as a metric of quality of care. We hypothesize that specific demographics and dispositions may be associated with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 72-h bouncebacks.

Methods

For all patient encounters within one calendar year from a large, urban EMS agency, we recorded demographics (name, date of birth, race, gender), primary impression, disposition, and vital signs for EMS encounters. A bounceback was defined as a patient, identified by matching first name, last name and date of birth, with more than one EMS encounter within 72 h. We performed descriptive statistics for patients that did and did not have a subsequent bounceback using median (interquartile range) and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for age and frequency (percent) and chi square test for gender, race and run disposition. For patients with a bounceback, we describe the frequency and percentage of EMS professional primary impressions on initial encounter.

Results

98,043 encounters from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, were analyzed. The median age was 50 years (IQR 32–65); 49.4% (46,147) were female and 50.7% (47,376) were White patients. 3951 encounters had a subsequent bounceback, and compared to those without bouncebacks, they were more often male patients (58.7% versus 50.2%, p < 0.001) and more commonly not transported (22.3% versus 15.5%, p < 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model estimated the odds of bounceback were lower for females [OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.61–0.68)], Asian and Latino patients compared to White patients [OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.21–0.53) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.34–0.51)], respectively, no significant difference for Black patients compared to White patients, and higher for non-transported patients [OR 1.25 (95% CI 1.16–1.34)]. The The most common EMS primary impression for initial and subsequent encounters was mental health [576 (14.7%) and 944 (17.0%), respectively]. For subsequent encounters, the primary impression was cardiac arrest or death in 67 (1.2%) of cases.

Conclusion

Bouncebacks were common in this single year study of a high-volume urban EMS agency. Male and non-transported patients most often experienced bouncebacks. The most common primary impression for encounters with bounceback was mental health related. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurred in 1 % of bounceback cases. Further study is necessary to understand the effect on patient-centered outcomes.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Emergency medical services, Bouncebacks, Unscheduled return visits, Prehospital medicine


Plan


© 2022  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 65

P. 113-117 - mars 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Comparison of efficacy and frequency of akathisia and dystonia between olanzapine, metoclopramide and prochlorperazine in ED headache patients
  • Elliott Chinn, Nicholas D. Brunette, Brian E. Driver, Lauren R. Klein, Jamie L. Stang, Paige DeVries, Erika Mojica, Abagail Raiter, James R. Miner, Jon B. Cole
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Outcomes of basic versus advanced prehospital life support in severe pediatric trauma
  • Danny Epstein, Sharon Goldman, Irina Radomislensky, Israel Trauma Group (ITG), Aeyal Raz, Ari M. Lipsky, Shaul Lin, Moran Bodas

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.