Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion with PEEK H-pode™ vs. Titanium Maxlock™ locking plates: Comparison of functional and radiographic outcomes - 01/02/23
Abstract |
Background |
Locking plates are increasingly used to achieve hindfoot fusion. The objective of this study was to compare hindfoot fusion outcomes with the PEEK H-pode™ (Biotech™) locking plate and the titanium Maxlock™ (Tornier-Wright™) locking plate.
Hypothesis |
A polyetheretherketone (PEEK) H-pode™ locking plate provides similar fusion rates to a titanium Maxlock™ locking plate for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid arthrodesis.
Methods |
We conducted a retrospective comparative study in 39 patients (including 21 [54%] with pes planovalgus and 11 [28%] with neurological equinovarus deformities) who underwent talo-navicular and/or calcaneo-cuboid fusion, usually combined with subtalar fusion. The first 17 patients (January 2014–February 2016) were managed with Maxlock™ locking plates and the next 22 patients (March 2016–August 2018) with H-pode™ locking plates. These two cohorts of consecutive patients were comparable regarding age, sex distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. At last follow-up more than 1year after surgery, we compared functional scores, pain intensity, and fusion assessed by radiographs and computed tomography (CT) (threshold set at 33%).
Results |
Mean follow-up was 42months (range: 34–63months) in the Maxlock™ group and 25months (range: 12–36months) in the H-pode™ group. At last follow-up, the two groups were not significantly different for the mean values of the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society score, European Foot & Ankle Society score, and visual analogue scale pain score. Neither were the two groups significantly different for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion by CT. In the Maxlock™ group, we found non-significant trends towards a higher proportion of patients with talo-navicular nonunion (18% vs. 5% in the H-pode™ group) and weaker talo-navicular fusion in patients with pes planovalgus (60.8% vs. 82.0%, respectively). Radiographic results overestimated the fusion rates.
Discussion |
Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion was not significantly different with H-pode™ and Maxlock™ locking plates. CT was more accurate than standard radiography to assess fusion. These results underline the usefulness of PEEK locking plates for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion; moreover, the radiolucency of PEEK facilitates the interpretation of radiographs.
Level of evidence |
IV.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Talo-navicular fusion, Calcaneo-cuboid fusion, Locking plates, Fusion, Computed tomography
Plan
Vol 109 - N° 1
Article 103343- février 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.