S'abonner

Effect of long-lasting insecticidal nets with and without piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda (LLINEUP): final results of a cluster-randomised trial embedded in a national distribution campaign - 26/01/23

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00469-8 
Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, MSc a, b, Samuel Gonahasa, MSc a, Moses R Kamya, ProfPhD a, c, Agaba Katureebe, MSc a, Irene Bagala, MBChB a, Amy Lynd, PhD d, Peter Mutungi, BSc a, Simon P Kigozi, PhD a, Jimmy Opigo, MBChB b, Janet Hemingway, ProfPhD d, Grant Dorsey, ProfPhD e, Martin J Donnelly, PhD d, f, Sarah G Staedke, ProfPhD a, g,
a Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda 
b National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda 
c Department of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda 
d Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK 
e Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA 
f Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK 
g Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof Sarah Staedke, Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration Kampala Uganda

Summary

Background

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the foundation of malaria control but resistance of mosquito vectors to pyrethroids threatens their effectiveness. We embedded a cluster-randomised trial into Uganda’s 2017–18 campaign to distribute LLINs. LLINs with piperonyl butoxide (PBO) reduced parasite prevalence more effectively than conventional LLINs (without PBO) for 18 months. Here, we report the final 25-month survey results.

Methods

LLINEUP was a cluster-randomised trial conducted in 48 districts in eastern and western Uganda. 104 health subdistricts (clusters) without ongoing or planned indoor residual spraying with pirimiphos-methyl (Actellic, Basel, Switzerland) were eligible for inclusion in the trial. Clusters were randomly assigned to PBO LLINs (PermaNet 3.0 or Olyset Plus) and conventional LLINs (PermaNet 2.0 or Olyset Net) with proportionate randomisation using STATA version 14.2. LLINs were delivered from March 25, 2017, to March 18, 2018. Between April 23, 2019, and Sept 13, 2019, community surveys were conducted in 50 randomly selected households per cluster; ten households per cluster were randomly selected for entomology surveys. Mosquitoes were collected in the morning from indoor surfaces of households using Prokopack aspirators. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, only 90 of the 104 clusters were surveyed at 25 months. The primary outcome was parasite prevalence by microscopy in children aged 2–10 years, assessed in the as-treated population, determined using the results from the 6-month household survey on the type of LLINs received in each cluster. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN17516395, and is now completed.

Findings

In the as-treated analysis, two clusters were excluded (no predominant LLIN received) and four were reassigned; 40 PBO LLIN clusters (30 PermaNet 3.0, ten Olyset Plus) and 48 non-PBO LLIN (36 PermaNet 2.0, 12 Olyset Net) were included. Parasite prevalence was 17·1% (506 of 2958 participants) in the PBO group and 19·8% (701 of 3534) in the non-PBO group (prevalence ratio adjusted for baseline 0·80 [95% CI 0·69–0·93], p=0·0048). Comparing within-treatment group parasite prevalence to baseline, parasite prevalence ratios were lower in the PBO groups at all timepoints, but the difference was greatest at 6 months (PBO LLINs parasite prevalence at baseline 28·8% [1001 of 3472, 95% CI 27·3–30·4] vs at 6 months 12·0% [361 of 3009, 10·9–13·2], prevalence ratio [PR] 0·43 [95% CI 0·36–0·52], p<0·0001; non-PBO LLINs parasite prevalence at baseline 25·4% [1015 of 4004, 24·0–26·7] vs 6 months 14·8% [526 of 3551, 13·7–16·0], PR 0·60 [0·54–0·68], p<0·0001) and 25 months (PBO LLINs parasite prevalence at 25 months 17·1% [506 of 2958, 15·8–18·5], PR 0·63 [95% CI 0·57–0·71], p<0·0001; non-PBO LLINs parasite prevalence at 25 months 19·8% [701 of 3534, 18·5–21·2], PR 0·79 [0·73–0·86], p<0·0001).

Interpretation

In Uganda, PBO LLINs outperformed pyrethroid-only LLINs for 25 months. WHO concluded that PBO LLINs are more effective against malaria than non-PBO LLINs when resistance to pyrethroids is high and issued a conditional recommendation suggesting PBO LLINs should be deployed in areas of pyrethroid resistance.

Funding

The Against Malaria Foundation, UK Department for International Development, Innovative Vector Control Consortium, and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2023  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 23 - N° 2

P. 247-258 - février 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, V116, in healthy adults: phase 1/2, randomised, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, multicentre, US-based trial
  • Heather Platt, Tosin Omole, Jose Cardona, Neil J Fraser, Richard A Mularski, Charles Andrews, Nizar Daboul, Nancy Gallagher, Aditi Sapre, Jianing Li, Adam Polis, Doreen Fernsler, Gretchen Tamms, Weifeng Xu, Rocio Murphy, Julie Skinner, Joseph Joyce, Luwy Musey
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Infections caused by Clostridium perfringens and Paeniclostridium sordellii after unsafe abortion
  • David M Aronoff, Jeanne M Marrazzo

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.