S'abonner

Emergency Department Visits During Pregnancy - 19/01/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.06.021 
Brittany A. Matenchuk, MSc a, Rhonda J. Rosychuk, PhD b, Brian H. Rowe, MD, MSc c, d, Amy Metcalfe, PhD e, Radha Chari, MD a, Susan Crawford, MSc f, Susan Jelinski, PhD c, f, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, PhD a, Maria B. Ospina, MSc, PhD a, d,
a Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
b Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
d School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
e Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 
f Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

Pregnant women often seek care in an emergency department (ED). We sought to describe the frequency, characteristics, and factors associated with increased ED visits during pregnancy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data of all pregnancies resulting in a live birth at 20 or more weeks of gestation in Alberta, Canada, from 2011 to 2017. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any ED visit during pregnancy. The secondary outcomes were ED visit characteristics and discharge disposition. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and increased ED visits during pregnancy using random-effect negative binomial regression adjusting for multiple pregnancies per person during the study period.

Results

We included 255,929 pregnancies from 193,965 women. Of all the pregnancy episodes followed, 37.3% (95% CI 37.1 to 37.5) had at least 1 ED visit, resulting in a total of 226,811 ED visits and an overall ED visit rate of 94.0 visits per 100 pregnancies (95% CI 93.6 to 94.3). Most visits were nonobstetric (46.4%) and resulted in ED discharge (85.3%). Increased ED visits were associated with living in remote (RR 6.9; 95 %CI 6.7 to 7.1) or rural (RR 3.4; 95% CI 3.4 to 3.5) areas, younger age (RR 1.9; 95% CI 1.8 to 2.0), intensive prenatal care (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.5 to 1.5), major/moderate health conditions (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.6 to 1.6), mental health conditions (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.5 to 1.6), and high antepartum risk score (RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.1).

Conclusion

Approximately 1 in 3 women in our sample visited the ED during pregnancy. A higher number of visits occurred in those with rural/remote residence, younger maternal age, and concomitant health conditions.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 198 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Daniel A. Handel, MD, MBA. Specific detailed information about possible conflicts of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: MBO, RJR, BHR, AM, RC, SC, and SJ conceptualized and designed the study. SC and SJ acquired the data. BAM, RJR, JSL, and MBO analyzed and interpreted the data. BAM and MBO drafted the manuscript. MBO, BAM, RJR, BHR, AM, RC, SC, SJ, and JSL critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. RJR provided statistical expertise. MBO acquired funding for the study. MBO takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. Supported by a Health Outcomes Improvement Fund Operating Grant and the Alberta Women's Health Foundation (Edmonton, Alberta) through a Women and Children's Health Research Institute Recruitment Award to Dr. Ospina. Dr. Rowe's research is supported by a Scientific Director's Grant (SOP 168483) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) through the Government of Canada (Ottawa, Ontario), which supported the statistical analysis. Dr. Ospina is supported by CIHR as a Canada Research Chair in Life Course, Social Environments and Health through the Government of Canada (950-232833).
 Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide 92RMVJB to Annals on this particular article.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2022  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 81 - N° 2

P. 197-208 - février 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Implementation of the Modified Canadian C-Spine Rule by Paramedics
  • Christian Vaillancourt, Manya Charette, Julie Sinclair, Richard Dionne, Peter Kelly, Justin Maloney, Marie-Joe Nemnom, George A. Wells, Ian G. Stiell
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Successful Optimization of Tobacco Dependence Treatment in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy
  • Steven L. Bernstein, James Dziura, June Weiss, Avis H. Brooks, Ted Miller, Katrina A. Vickerman, Lauretta E. Grau, Michael V. Pantalon, Lorien Abroms, Linda M. Collins, Benjamin Toll

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.